Still celebrating National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17

x
?
Solved

Cisco 1700 and 828

Posted on 2004-08-02
4
Medium Priority
?
224 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-11
hello there,
Just want to know if I can connect:
Cisco 828 G.SHDSL port TO Cisco 1700 WAN G.SHDSL ?

Would it work through a private wire.
if NO, is there any router that will allow me to connect to 828 that will have 2 G.SHDSL ports ?
The 3700 is a bit expensive.

Sorry about the points, it just cause I don't have enogh : )

thanx,
moe_740
0
Comment
Question by:moe_740
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:fatlad
ID: 11692968
In short no to both your questions, the Cisco routers are designed to connect to a DSLAM at the telco's central office. You could try point to point connection kits from net to net http:www.nettonet.com they are designed just for this (althought they act at layer 2 and so will not route between subnets).
0
 

Author Comment

by:moe_740
ID: 11700592
I'm sure  that we can connect the 828 cisco through DSAL (we have already installed it in another location), but I'm looking for a router that will have 2 G.SHDSL ports (which will connect 2 sites to 1), unless if I get 4 cisco 828 routers !!! all 3 locations will be in the same subnet (no many users).





0
 
LVL 3

Accepted Solution

by:
fatlad earned 150 total points
ID: 11701152
Don't I feel the thicky! So sorry, I was totally and utterly wrong in my first post, check out http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk175/tk274/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080135834.shtml
 for instructions to do exactly what you are after. The 1700 series would probably be sufficient with two G.SHDSL WICs and and Ethernet port for your central office and the 828s at the branch.

It may be easier to split the networks into three subnets to prevent broadcast traffic taking up your precious WAN traffic, it would be quite easy to configure, static defaults at the branches and static routes at the centre. Will make troubleshooting easier as well as you can tell where a machine is by its IP address.

Regards

FatLad
0
 

Author Comment

by:moe_740
ID: 11712303
I think 4 x 828 cisco routers will do the job.
thank you for replying your thoughts.


moe_740
0

Featured Post

Take our survey for a chance to win!

As a valued customer of Targus, we’d like to ask you a few questions about us. As thanks, you will be automatically entered for a chance to win a $500 VISA gift card. To enter, just complete the survey by September 15, 2017.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article will inform Clients about common and important expectations from the freelancers (Experts) who are looking at your Gig.
This article is a collection of issues that people face from time to time and possible solutions to those issues. I hope you enjoy reading it.
There's a multitude of different network monitoring solutions out there, and you're probably wondering what makes NetCrunch so special. It's completely agentless, but does let you create an agent, if you desire. It offers powerful scalability …
NetCrunch network monitor is a highly extensive platform for network monitoring and alert generation. In this video you'll see a live demo of NetCrunch with most notable features explained in a walk-through manner. You'll also get to know the philos…
Suggested Courses

688 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question