Solved

Permitted 802.11b transmitter power

Posted on 2004-08-03
6
757 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-09
Hi, I wonder if anyone can help ?
I am currently using a Cisco Aironet 1200 AP with the standard rubber duck aerials.
As I understand it, these dipoles have a gain of 2.2dBi. In the UK we are limited by ETSI regulations in this band to a maximum EIRP of 100mW (20 dBm), which means the AP tx power has to be set to 50mW (17 dBm), which gives an EIRP of 19.2 dBm = 83mW
I need to extend the coverage slightly and was wondering about using a higher gain aerial on the AP. However since I would then have to lower the tx power to 30mW to avoid going over the 20dBm limit, it might not give any improvement. Has anyone any suggestions, and my question is: since the actual received power right next to the AP (measured using a Fluke Waverunner) is only about -30 dBm, why is the permitted EIRP set so low as it seems that most of the tx power is not radiated anyway ?
0
Comment
Question by:chris_smailes
  • 4
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 8

Expert Comment

by:rfgkev
ID: 11714131
you cannot extend the coverage much by doing this, the only gain would be a boost to the recieved signal strength, so unless you can do the same on the clients you will not get a much extended range. However the 2.2 dbi antennae usually give a 'Doughnut shaped' signal, which gives good coverage around and above the antennae, take a look at something like a 6dbi omni, they give a flatter signal but usually better range. Again, it also depends on the client aswell as to the range you can get. Some manufacturers do produce range extending antennae for their client adapters.

Unknown why the EIRP for our region (ETSI) is so low, especially compared to mobile phones (>3 W). have had this conversation with a number of manufacturers of wireless equipment but still have no satisfactory answer, best one was "They probably picked that number out of a hat".

0
 

Author Comment

by:chris_smailes
ID: 11733726
Thanks for that information; it tallies with the way I was thinking, but I still don't understand why the measured radio signal power within a few mm of the AP aerial is so low.
Even taking into account the SWR of the aerial, which would give an 11% loss in signal, it is clear that nothing like the +18.5 dBm I calculated is being radiated. It seems that the radio signal strength from the aerial is a quantity of microwatts rather than the expected milliwatts.
0
 
LVL 8

Expert Comment

by:rfgkev
ID: 11733790
-30 is what you would expect being right next to the antennae, although you are sending nearly 20db to transmit, conducting it to the air and passing through the air causes a massive initial drop in power, having worked mainly on external point - point links we used to work on the fact that a signal would drop roughly 100 - 110db in the first Km (known as Free Space Loss)

The actual calculation used is

Lp= 92.45 + 20Log10F + 20Log10d

Lp= Path loss in decibels
F= frequency in GHz
dB= decibels
d= Distance in kilometres
0
Register Today - IoT Current and Future Threats

Are you prepared to protect your organization from current and future IoT Threats?  Join our Wi-Fi expert in episode three of our webinar series for a look at the current state of Wi-Fi IoT and what may lie ahead. Register for our live webinar on April 20th at 9 am PDT!

 
LVL 8

Accepted Solution

by:
rfgkev earned 500 total points
ID: 11733805
Take a look at http://www.solwise.co.uk/los.htm it will give u a bit more info
0
 

Author Comment

by:chris_smailes
ID: 11735763
Thanks - I've been investigating and found out similar information - which brings me back to the point that the ETSI EIRP limit is too low but we'll just have to live with it and plan around it, especially, as you point out, that most client cards can't actually transmit at that level.
Thanks again.
0
 
LVL 8

Expert Comment

by:rfgkev
ID: 11735985
most of the client cards i've worked with only transmit at around 15db so as you said, the 20db limit isn't really much of an issue until you start playing with external point to point links.
0

Featured Post

Connect further...control easier

With the ATEN CE624, you can now enjoy a high-quality visual experience powered by HDBaseT technology and the convenience of a single Cat6 cable to transmit uncompressed video with zero latency and multi-streaming for dual-view applications where remote access is required.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Business router 18 102
OKI wireless printer setup 13 96
Which Wireless Network Card That's Compatible? 7 65
mini spy rotating camera 3 78
This article is split into background info to start and actual review at bottom: Some time ago I wanted to sell a system with both wired and wireless capability but at minimum expense.  Having visited my trusted online auction I was pleasantly su…
I recently purchased a Bluetooth headset called the Music Jogger (model BSH10). The control buttons on it look like this: One of my goals is to use it as the microphone and speakers for Skype calls. In that respect, it works well. However, I …
In a recent question (https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/29004105/Run-AutoHotkey-script-directly-from-Notepad.html) here at Experts Exchange, a member asked how to run an AutoHotkey script (.AHK) directly from Notepad++ (aka NPP). This video…
I've attached the XLSM Excel spreadsheet I used in the video and also text files containing the macros used below. https://filedb.experts-exchange.com/incoming/2017/03_w12/1151775/Permutations.txt https://filedb.experts-exchange.com/incoming/201…

679 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question