?
Solved

Recommendations on Exchange 2003 Hardware Configuration

Posted on 2004-08-05
4
Medium Priority
?
440 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-19
I am contemplating whether this setup will be sufficent for a Exchange Server 2003 Deployment. Please look over the following hardware configuration and see if it will meet my performance expectations.

Enviroment: Windows 2003 Server with AD. 25 users with a planned expansion to 150 within next three years. All users use email and MSN Messenger.

Hardware:

Intel P4 3.2E GHz Processor with HT
4GB of DDR 400 ECC
WD Raptor 36.7GB Drives in RAID 1 Array (OS Drive)
Segate 36.7GB U320 Drives in RAID 5 Array (Database and Logs Drive in Two Drive Letters)
Intel Gigabit Ethernet Adapter
Intel Server Board

Will the configuration meet my needs? Would you change anything about this configuration and why? At what point do I need to go dual processor?
0
Comment
Question by:SenderoSnake
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 104

Accepted Solution

by:
Sembee earned 500 total points
ID: 11730196
That is plenty. The RAM is plenty - I have 80 users on 1gb RAM so 4gb is plenty.
I would adjust the partitions though.
Having the logs and database on the same RAID array doesn't really give you any benefit. Split the RAID 1 in to two and put the logs on to the second partition.
Ideally you would have RAID 1 (OS) RAID 1 (LOGS) RAID 5 (DB). This requires 7 disks - 8 if you want a hot spare.

MSN Messenger? There is no instant messenging in Exchange 2003. Are you planning to use LCS instead?

Simon.
0
 
LVL 21

Expert Comment

by:marc_nivens
ID: 11730498
Be sure you set the /3GB switch in the boot.ini file since you have > 1 GB of memory, or you'll eventually get memory fragmentation errors.

See:  http://support.microsoft.com/?id=823440
0
 
LVL 51

Expert Comment

by:Netman66
ID: 11732175
Nice server!  You'll have no trouble at all supporting 25 users with that beast.

0
 
LVL 51

Expert Comment

by:Netman66
ID: 11732184
Oh...and it will scale up to the 150 with no modifications.
0

Featured Post

Get real performance insights from real users

Key features:
- Total Pages Views and Load times
- Top Pages Viewed and Load Times
- Real Time Site Page Build Performance
- Users’ Browser and Platform Performance
- Geographic User Breakdown
- And more

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

I've always wanted to allow a user to have a printer no matter where they login. The steps below will show you how to achieve just that. In this Article I'll show how to deploy printers automatically with group policy and then using security fil…
This article provides a convenient collection of links to Microsoft provided Security Patches for operating systems that have reached their End of Life support cycle. Included operating systems covered by this article are Windows XP,  Windows Server…
Michael from AdRem Software explains how to view the most utilized and worst performing nodes in your network, by accessing the Top Charts view in NetCrunch network monitor (https://www.adremsoft.com/). Top Charts is a view in which you can set seve…
In this video, Percona Solution Engineer Dimitri Vanoverbeke discusses why you want to use at least three nodes in a database cluster. To discuss how Percona Consulting can help with your design and architecture needs for your database and infras…
Suggested Courses

771 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question