Still celebrating National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17


Wasted space on workstation

Posted on 2004-08-09
Medium Priority
Last Modified: 2010-04-11

I have 5 new workstation in my business domain. Like all new computers, they all come with 40 or even 80Gb. Obviously all the users work is going on to the central storage server.  Because of that, the workstations usualy don't use up more than 10Gb. So i have about 30Gb free on all the workstations.  5x30=150Gb wasted!!
Is there a way to combine all the free space on the workstations into one big virtual volume or something like it?  And is it recomended?
Question by:AlexanderR
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions

Expert Comment

ID: 11755000
I don't know of a way to combine them all, but you can certainly use them by enabling sharing on them and them mapping systems to them.

I don't recommend it for the following reasons:
1) It's hard to backup. You'd have to buy remote agents for each system you store data on.
2) It's difficult to manage. You store all files in a central place for a reason.
3) Systems are unreliable. You have nothing preventing the users from turning the systems off and preventing access to data. In addition laptop users may roam.

Good Luck.
LVL 11

Author Comment

ID: 11755258
Thanks. I understand.

Does anyone have ideas how otherwise i can use that space?

Accepted Solution

intreeg earned 800 total points
ID: 11755272
If you are simply speaking of the 5 new machines. It would be a better idea to remove the larger size drives and replace them with something more suitable for their needs. This way you could simply install the larger drive directly into the centeral file server. There would be a little added cost to acquire the smaller drives and possible and IDE RAID controller. Howerver, you may also be able to sell off a couple of the larger drives to off set the cost. I cannot imagine a 10 or 15GB drive costing that much anymore. Considering I seen a 200GB for $79.99 the other day. Not the greatest solution either but would solve some of the issues given by syn_ack_fin.
Moving data to the cloud? Find out if you’re ready

Before moving to the cloud, it is important to carefully define your db needs, plan for the migration & understand prod. environment. This wp explains how to define what you need from a cloud provider, plan for the migration & what putting a cloud solution into practice entails.

LVL 11

Author Comment

ID: 11755357
Thanks, i will try the options out.

Expert Comment

ID: 11755427
Just Had A Thought:
1. Sell Two Drives.
2. Buy 5 Smaller Drives
3. Buy 1 IDE RAID controller
4. Install and Load the smaller drives in the workstations
5. Install and configure the RAID controller and 3 larger drives for RAID5 using an older machine that you could proabably piece together for next to nothing. Install Linux on it to avoid the requirement of another MS license. You would just need to install/configure Samba and you should have a VERY inexpensive and fairly large fileserver.
LVL 11

Author Comment

ID: 11756270
I realy like that option.
Only have one question.  That older machine, what is the minimum power you recomend for what you have said?  I got a 300MHz and i think somewhere below 256Mb RAM, for an old machine.

Only problem left, is if my boss will agree to do that.  Doubt that.  I will try it though.  Sounds good.

Expert Comment

ID: 11756710
That 300 should be fine. Linux is not resource heavy at all with no X-server running, which you wouldn't need obviously. I have a P90 I am using as a firewall at my house. Runs fine, just takes a while to load or patch, but that does not take place to often so it works out nicely.
As for your boss, I know how that goes. Just got to remeber if it will save them money in the long run (and the will) they are more likely to do it. Stick to you guns, Linux is  free how much better can it get?

Expert Comment

ID: 11758530
At my place now, 120AU$ can buy a 120G IDE HDD.  So 1AU$ per G. Buying a 20G or 10G is hard (and cost 2/3 of the cost of a 40G HDD), unless you want to use SCSI. However you can buy old/cheap/obsolete HDD but slower speed and (maybe) not supported.

 intreeg suggestion is very interesting, but not so cost effective :( And eventhough the 300 will work effectively as a file server, you may have problem with networking and setting up the server. A 300MHz may go with a mainboard that not support 40 or 80G HDD as well, unless you pay for a good RAID controller.

I'd better go with nothing (just leave it there, you'll need it in the future). In the next few years, no one will need a 20G HDD (and there's no way you can resell those machines once you finished with them). Use the space for swap file and create partitions to back up each machine (so you can restore it in minutes when crashed), so you won't feel like wasting space. And it won't cost you extra to do that.

Just my thoughts. It's up to you anyway, and good luck.

Expert Comment

ID: 11763919
I agree with most of what NetExpert said, except having trouble with networking and setting up the server. I am not sure what is meant by this. Linux is not as scary as most people think. It is rather simple actually, and the documentation cannot be beat. As for the RAID controller, yes you could end up spending quite a bit if you wanted to. Or you could buy two of them for around $20US and have a reserve incase the first one breaks.
As for the drive you would be installing in the PC's, just as stated before its about $1US/GB so 5 x20GB = $100US + $40US(for 2 IDE RAID controllers) = $140. Through in some shipping cost and you are still under $175US. That probably one of the cheapest fileservers I have seen.

And for the idea of using a second partition to store a backup image etc. Why not store them all on a central storage area and push the image across the network for reinstallation? That method has worked for me for years. Not too mention not giving the end-user too much space to fill with mp3z or any other garbage that we allow them to put on their hard drives. Then your back image becomes huge and takes more time and space than using one central core system image and inform the end-user that any data not stored on their network drive will be lost in the case of a crash. The simply running cleaning scripts on your fileserver to erase *.mp3  etc or whatever administration method you choose. As long as these administration polices are followed and only applications deemed necessary for work function are installed, the desktops should not need more than 20GB unless you are producing digital video or other storage heavy processes. For example you can run win2k or xp on 4GB with office installed. Other than a few other job specific applications that should be about all a streamline or core installation should require for typical business functionality.

I do not believe that NetExperts suggestion is a bad one by any means. However, I do not see it as being a solution to your question. As well, it would not provide a centralized point of administration.

Featured Post

 [eBook] Windows Nano Server

Download this FREE eBook and learn all you need to get started with Windows Nano Server, including deployment options, remote management
and troubleshooting tips and tricks

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article is a collection of issues that people face from time to time and possible solutions to those issues. I hope you enjoy reading it.
This article explains the fundamentals of industrial networking which ultimately is the backbone network which is providing communications for process devices like robots and other not so interesting stuff.
Here's a very brief overview of the methods PRTG Network Monitor ( offers for monitoring bandwidth, to help you decide which methods you´d like to investigate in more detail.  The methods are covered in more detail in o…
This video gives you a great overview about bandwidth monitoring with SNMP and WMI with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor ( If you're looking for how to monitor bandwidth using netflow or packet s…

722 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question