T-SQL Problem - Invalid Column Name

I was in the process of transforming a database out of Access into SQL Server, and re-writing some queries, i.e. "views", when I noticed something.  It appears that TSQL will not allow the re-use of an alias in the query?

Here is what I was doing successfully in Access... let's say in the middle of my query somewhere I do...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Select myFieldA * 100 + myFieldB + 42 AS [myAliasField].....

and then later in the Access query, I can directly access the alias again without recreating it...

...(select continued)... select [myAliasField] as [myAliasCopy]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE PROBLEM:
Perhaps there is some special syntax in TSQL to allow for this?  TSQL gives me the error, "Invalid Column Name" when I try to access/select the alias a second time.  It's hard to believe that this can be done in Access, but cannot be done in SQL Server.  Can anyone shed some light on this one?

Thanks

LVL 2
born4codeAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Webinar] Streamline your web hosting managementRegister Today

x
 
arbertConnect With a Mentor Commented:
You're right--to be able to use and alias, you would have to recode the same statement, or use a dervied table....

Post exactly what you're trying to do/convert.

Brett
0
 
Scott PletcherSenior DBACommented:
Except that you can use an alias in an ORDER BY (presumably because the alias same has already been "processed" by the sort phase).
0
 
Anthony PerkinsCommented:
>>Except that you can use an alias in an ORDER BY<<
Right and in MS Access that is not allowed, go figure.  

By the way, the only reason I bring this up in this Topic Area, is becuase the questioner brought up discrepancies between T-SQL and the SQL dialect used by MS Access.
0
Free Tool: SSL Checker

Scans your site and returns information about your SSL implementation and certificate. Helpful for debugging and validating your SSL configuration.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

 
born4codeAuthor Commented:
Sorry it took so long to follow up...

Well, if you want a sample, I can give you a piece of one query (that is pages long)... just so you get the idea.  It really is nothing different than I posted the first time.

AvgFP * sum(MS_Data.[SP_STD_Qty]) *  [SP_STD_Std_Corr] AS SP_STD_StdFace,
([SP_STD_StdFace] * (1+[SP_STD_Per])^vMS_LE.LE+1) AS FaceValue

You can see here, that I repeat the calculation "SP_STD_StdFace".  I do not have to recalculate it for the second line.  Same concept.  

Any ideas?
0
 
Anthony PerkinsCommented:
>>Any ideas?<<
As arbert has pointed out, you will have to repeat it or use a derived table.
0
 
arbertCommented:
Ya, I was pretty sure of what you were saying in your original question.....
0
All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.