omegabeta
asked on
Primary partition vs Extended partition
On a XP system I had C:(20GB) and D:(60GB).
With Partition Magic (DOS ver.) I can split D into E,F,G each one with 20GB as follow:
1. All as primary partitions NTFS.
2.E,F,G as logical partitions of an extended partition.
Which one are more convenient(advantages and disadvantages)
Thanks
With Partition Magic (DOS ver.) I can split D into E,F,G each one with 20GB as follow:
1. All as primary partitions NTFS.
2.E,F,G as logical partitions of an extended partition.
Which one are more convenient(advantages and disadvantages)
Thanks
I was in a Paq (still looking for it) with 3+ experts and it was decided that more than 2 partitions is a bad idea
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
The standard (old-fashioned) way is to make one primary partition and one extended to fill up the disk. Inside the extended partition you create logical units. Unless you start shuffling the drive letters around and other experimental activities, there are no problems with more than two logical drives ("partitions").
/RID
/RID
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.