Solved

ROUTE ADD problems on 2003 multihomed system.

Posted on 2004-08-24
7
195 Views
Last Modified: 2011-10-03
BACKGROUND:

We needed to connect a 2003 system to another network via VPN.  The VPN network originally had the same IP scheme as the 2003 network (10.0.0.0/24).  Using a NAT device on the VPN network side, we were able to present a different scheme (172.16.254.0/24) to the 2003 side.
The 2003 side now needs to present a different scheme to the VPN side.  We chose 172.16.252.0/24.  We *cannot* install a NAT device on the 2003 side, so we multihomed the 2003 system:  

NIC 0x1 - 10.0.0.2/24, gateway 10.0.0.1
NIC 0x2 - 172.16.252.2/24, no gateway defined

Both are plugged into the same switch.

10.0.0.1 is a firewall with VPN set-up to the 172.16.254.0/24 network.  The VPN is negotiating and passing traffic.

PROBLEM:

I am attempting to route traffic from the 2003 system to the VPN network.  172.16.252.2 -> 172.16.254.3, and vice versa.

Receiving packets on the additional interface is no problem.  It ARPS fine to the firewall and *receives* data all day long.

*Sending* data is the problem.  The default route uses the 10.0.0.2 interface.  Attempting to add a route to use the additional interface for VPN traffic:

ROUTE ADD 172.16.254.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.1 IF 0x2

Gets me:

"The route addition failed: Either the interface index is wrong or the gateway does not lie on the same network as the interface. Check the IP Address Table for the machine."

This is a stumper.  Any ideas folks???

Thanks!!!!!
0
Comment
Question by:rrsarge
  • 3
7 Comments
 
LVL 15

Expert Comment

by:adamdrayer
ID: 11884845
ROUTE ADD 172.16.254.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.1 IF 2

0
 

Author Comment

by:rrsarge
ID: 11884891
Does not work.  No change in the error.
0
 
LVL 15

Expert Comment

by:adamdrayer
ID: 11884948
sorry.  10.0.0.1 is not on the same network as 172.16.252.2.  This will not work.

In my opinion, you should setup a VPN client to handle this.  Also, I don't understand your comment about not setting up NAT on the 2003 side.  You can setup rules to NAT certain addresses and not others and NAT certain ways.  You could setup a system to NAT all traffic destined for the VPN, and not NAT all others.  You must be running some kind of NAT since your using an RF1918 addressing scheme.
0
 
LVL 15

Accepted Solution

by:
adamdrayer earned 125 total points
ID: 11884970
basically, you're gonna need a gateway on the 172.16.252.2/24 network.
0

Featured Post

Control application downtime with dependency maps

Visualize the interdependencies between application components better with Applications Manager's automated application discovery and dependency mapping feature. Resolve performance issues faster by quickly isolating problematic components.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

A brief overview to explain gateways, default gateways and static routes OR NO - you CANNOT have two default gateways on the same server, PC or other Windows-based network device. In simple terms a gateway is formed when a computer such as a serv…
I'm a big fan of Windows' offline folder caching and have used it on my laptops for over a decade.  One thing I don't like about it, however, is how difficult Microsoft has made it for the cache to be moved out of the Windows folder.  Here's how to …
This Micro Tutorial will give you a basic overview how to record your screen with Microsoft Expression Encoder. This program is still free and open for the public to download. This will be demonstrated using Microsoft Expression Encoder 4.
This Micro Tutorial demonstrates using Microsoft Excel pivot tables, how to reverse engineer competitors' marketing strategies through backlinks.

920 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

14 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now