Solved

Gigabit backbone between 2 servers

Posted on 2004-08-25
4
984 Views
Last Modified: 2008-01-09
Hello, we are setting up a web server with a db backend.  The web server will be running Windows 2003 Enterprise and the DB/File Server is running Windows 2000 Advanced server. Right now the local network is 10/100, but we want to add extra cards to the servers for maximum transmission speed between them, thus we're looking at gigabit cards.

Questions:

1. What brands/models are recommended for low-medium load servers?  (I've seen some Intels for $50 and other Intels for $100, but I don't know what the difference is.  Please don't think I'm limiting myself to Intels, though.).

2. How do I configure the servers to use the Gigabit adapters when communicating with each other and the 10/100 to deal with the clients?

Thank you.
0
Comment
Question by:fuze44
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
4 Comments
 
LVL 1

Accepted Solution

by:
clicker666 earned 350 total points
ID: 11894984
Hmmm.... does the rest of the network need to see the DB server, or just the front end.  If just the front end I imagine a crossover cable between the two servers, and change the IP's on the new network cards to something out of the remaining network's subnet.  As far as brand goes, I think the IBM is probably a good idea.  I've got a 3Com in the office here that I cannot get to work at a gigabit, no matter what.  My three Intel cards, one of them on a server mainboard, work perfectly.

If you need the two servers to be able to communicate not only with each other but the rest of the network you could try some routing.  You might be able to setup your routes on the two machines for something like this....

Server 1 - IP 192.168.0.1
Server 2 - IP 192.168.0.2

Add a route to each machine detailing the network card interface that you want traffic to a specific IP address (ie - the other machine) to.  *Should* work, although I haven't tested.  In my network I have 3 10/100 switches supporting the workstations, each one linked with the 1000 switch.  Each server is plugged directly into the 1000 switch.  Given this configuration the servers have no choice but to travel through the gigabit, and all workstations access the servers through the 10/100, via one last hop to the gigabit switch.  
0
 

Author Comment

by:fuze44
ID: 11895253
That was some excellent information. Thank you.

I should specify: The clients will be communicating with both servers through the existing 10/100 network.  The 2 servers will be crossedover directly to each other.
0
 
LVL 104

Assisted Solution

by:Sembee
Sembee earned 75 total points
ID: 11895712
I have just converted a client from a direct cable to cable connection to a switch and seen a big performance increase.

What I did was remove or disable the existing network card and put a gb card in instead. These cards are connected to a cheap gb switch. This switch is then connected to the switch that the clients are on.

If the budget will allow, find a replacement switch for the clients with GB uplink. This will provide the maximum performance for the clients as they can use more of the 100 to connect to the servers - rather than share the single 100 uplink they are sharing a 1000 uplink.

Simon.
0
 
LVL 11

Assisted Solution

by:PennGwyn
PennGwyn earned 75 total points
ID: 11896455
> 2. How do I configure the servers to use the Gigabit adapters when communicating with each other and the 10/100 to deal
> with the clients?

Connect the Gig links with a crossover cable, and assign the Gig NICs private IP addresses in a range not used elsewhere in your network.  The web server will use the current 10/100 network to reach the DB server for anything for which it has the current server address, but the gig for any use configured with the new private address.

0

Featured Post

Free NetCrunch network monitor licenses!

Only on Experts-Exchange: Sign-up for a free-trial and we'll send you your permanent license!

Here is what you get: 30 Nodes | Unlimited Sensors | No Time Restrictions | Absolutely FREE!

Act now. This offer ends July 14, 2017.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

When it comes to security, there are always trade-offs between security and convenience/ease of administration. This article examines some of the main pros and cons of using key authentication vs password authentication for hosting an SFTP server.
This article explains the fundamentals of industrial networking which ultimately is the backbone network which is providing communications for process devices like robots and other not so interesting stuff.
If you're a developer or IT admin, you’re probably tasked with managing multiple websites, servers, applications, and levels of security on a daily basis. While this can be extremely time consuming, it can also be frustrating when systems aren't wor…
NetCrunch network monitor is a highly extensive platform for network monitoring and alert generation. In this video you'll see a live demo of NetCrunch with most notable features explained in a walk-through manner. You'll also get to know the philos…
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month11 days, 9 hours left to enroll

623 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question