Solved

Since when did a x86 system have more than 16 interrupts?!?!?

Posted on 2004-08-25
5
224 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-25
I'm looking through my device settings for one of my cards, and Windows XP reports that it's on interrupt 16!  I know that a standard x86 computer used to have interrupts 0-15 for hardware control...

Did they make changes when the Pentium 4 came out that allowed for more than 16 hardware interrupts?  Or is this just some smoke and mirror tactics done by Microsoft?

I even used a PCI32 program to get a list of the interrupts, and I had all the way up to Interrupt 22!

What I'm thinking is that Windows is somehow "binding" the hardware to a software interrupt.  If this is true, please let me know.

Thanks for any help you can provide.  This should be a rather easy question to answer.
0
Comment
  • 2
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 69

Accepted Solution

by:
Callandor earned 25 total points
ID: 11903104
Since APIC (Advanced Programmable Interface Controller) was introduced, interrupts can be shared and additional interrupts were added (I think there are 24 now).  Win2K and WinXP can take advantage of this (maybe Win98SE also).
0
 
LVL 8

Assisted Solution

by:stockhes
stockhes earned 25 total points
ID: 11904920

Here is a breaf explanation

Windows2000/XP supports the advanced programmable interrupt controller (APIC) using MPS version 1.4.
APIC distribuate a set of devices that form an interrupt controller by connecting to a local APIC bus.

APIC expand to 24 IRQs and sharing of IRQs.
In Windows2000/XP with APIC enabled, it will show 24 IRQs instead of the classic 15 or less  .

On nForce2 chipsets enabling APIC can result in some minor performance hit in I/O itensive applications.
Systems seems to prefer to run the old-fashioned way.
Drawback with old way is less flexible assignments for interrupt requests ,but if you are not loaded with devices
this option can be concidered.
I suspect higher access latencys for the tha devices in APIC mode compared to the IRQ assignment without APIC is the reason for difference.


APIC ENABLED:
There are 24 different IRQs possible and it could be no sharing. However at "System Information"
some of the IRQs are unused ,and there is still sharing between e.g. the IDE controllers,USB and ethernet controller.Why this is i don't know.
 

APIC DISABLED: 15 IRQs are available and is schared between devices.
The assignments of IRQs is very different from with the APIC enbled situation.

 
WHAT EFFECTS YOU:
With APIC enabled there is possible with more device support without IRQ sharing.

Without APIC you have more sharing but devices that have been assigned their own exclusive IRQs or may be running faster.With disabled it seems you have better contol yourself.And there has been benchmark that shows small
improvments in speed for some devices.

The previous NVIDIA SW-IDE driver
You install 2000/XP loads the drivers from the mb cd.
And........
Answers yes to intsll the SW-IDE .Resultingt in complete crashes and possibly corrupting HDDs files.
Supposedly the earlier sw-ide driver bundled in chipset versions older than 3.13 didn't support APIC .Nvidia also removed the sw-ide driver from their unified 2.45 release leaving the users to run with the microsoft ide driver.

Be aware that switching from APIC enabled to disabled mode in BIOS does require a complete reinstallation of the operating system.(boot problems)
So you have to choose this prior to installing 2000/XP .

0
 

Author Comment

by:Lost_In_JavaScript_Land
ID: 11909692
Since Callandor answered the question first, he will get the original 25 points.  Since I am extremely low on points right now, I will wait a few days to award the points until I have 20 extra points to give to stockhes for his very detailed answer.
0
 
LVL 69

Expert Comment

by:Callandor
ID: 11914415
Even I would give stockhes points for his detailed answer! ;-)
0
 

Author Comment

by:Lost_In_JavaScript_Land
ID: 11963422
I'm assigning the points now.
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Port Scanner

Check which ports are open to the outside world. Helps make sure that your firewall rules are working as intended.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Lenovo Drivers won't take 3 61
keyboard not producing correct character 15 121
Which Wireless Network Card That's Compatible? 7 63
Windows 10 Slow to recognise CD's 8 60
Windows 7 does not have the best desktop search built in. This is something Windows 7 users have struggled with. You type something in, and your search results don’t always match what you are looking for, or it doesn’t actually work at all. There ar…
I use more than 1 computer in my office for various reasons. Multiple keyboards and mice take up more than just extra space, they make working a little more complicated. Using one mouse and keyboard for all of my computers makes life easier. This co…
The Email Laundry PDF encryption service allows companies to send confidential encrypted  emails to anybody. The PDF document can also contain attachments that are embedded in the encrypted PDF. The password is randomly generated by The Email Laundr…

820 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question