Solved

Proxy arp not responding

Posted on 2004-08-26
5
1,928 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-05
I have a LAN with private IP addresses that I need to route to two ISP's for redundancy and load balancing.


                                                                                      ------x.x.x.34 HOST
                                                                                    /
                                                       /eth1----------SWITCH --- wireless x.x.x.x/27 public addresses (SNAT --to x.x.x.35-x.x.x.62)
 192.168.0.0 LAN ---eth0--linux----|
                                                       \ppp0 ---------ADSL (masquerade with this interface)

For the traffic going through wireless interface, I would like to use a range of ip addresses.

ip forwarding - on
proxy arp for eth1 - on

iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -s 192.168.0.0/27 -j SNAT --to x.x.x.35-x.x.x.62
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -j MASQUERADE

If I use MASQUERADE or SNAT to interface's real address, everything is OK, but I can't make eth1 advertise x.x.x.35-x.x.x.62 range for ARP.
If I try to ping from 192.168.0.2 to x.x.x.34, on x.x.x.34 host, I receive ICMP request, but it can't reply because eth1 is not replying for ARP requests for x.x.x.35-62.

Any suggestion ?
0
Comment
Question by:Znasev
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:de2Zotjes
ID: 11902151
You need to tell your box to respond to the arp requests (in /proc.., switching on proxy arp) and with which address to respond to the arp-requests:

arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.35 eth1 pub

there is a possibility to supply a network mask, but you could also just stick lines for .35 to .62 in script file.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Znasev
ID: 11910690
That's what I am doing, but it is not working.

The script:

#! /bin/bash

#eth0 = 192.168.0.1
#eth1 = x.x.x.60
#eth2 = 10.0.0.1

iptables --flush
iptables -t nat --flush
iptables -t mangle --flush
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -s 192.168.0.0/24 -j SNAT --to x.x.x.36-x.x.x.59
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.36 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.37 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.38 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.39 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.40 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.41 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.42 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.43 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.44 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.45 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.46 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.47 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.48 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.49 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.50 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.51 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.52 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.53 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.54 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.55 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.56 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.57 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.58 eth1 pub
arp -i eth1 -Ds x.x.x.59 eth1 pub
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth1/proxy_arp
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
# end of script

-------------------------------------------
Now pinging from 192.168.0.2:
ping x.x.x.34
-------------------------------------------

tcpdump on x.x.x.34 host:
tcpdump -i eth0 -nt 'icmp or arp'

listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
IP x.x.x.50 > x.x.x.34: icmp 40: echo request seq 12544
arp who-has x.x.x.50 tell x.x.x.34
arp who-has x.x.x.50 tell x.x.x.34
IP x.x.x.50 > x.x.x.34: icmp 40: echo request seq 12800
arp who-has x.x.x.50 tell x.x.x.34
IP x.x.x.50 > x.x.x.34: icmp 40: echo request seq 13056
IP x.x.x.50 > x.x.x.34: icmp 40: echo request seq 13312
arp who-has x.x.x.50 tell x.x.x.34
arp who-has x.x.x.50 tell x.x.x.34
arp who-has x.x.x.50 tell x.x.x.34

As you can see there is no arp reply.
I am using Julian Atanasov's patches if they are making any difference in replying.
0
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:de2Zotjes
ID: 11912898
Oops,

Just read up on proxy arp (didn't use it since the 2.0 kernels...) You can't use it for this purpose, you can only use it to reply to arp queries that are directed at other ip-networks. So in this particular case you should just assign extra ip's to your interface:

ip addr add x.x.x.35 dev eth1

That should do the trick :-)
You can switch off proxy arp off course
0
 

Author Comment

by:Znasev
ID: 11919791
Ok this is working :-)
Just to make sure that I understand what's going on, please correct me if I am wrong:

1. The packets originating from 192.168.0.0/24 network while passing POSTROUTING chain are SNAT-ed with one address of x.x.x.36-59 range and computer keeps track of SNAT-ed adresses and established connections.
2. When a packet from internet arrives on eth1 with destination x.x.x.36-59 and this packet is a part of  previously established connection with 192.168.0.0/24      host, it will be DNAT-ed to correct address and forwarded to 192.168.0.0 network..
3.When a packet from internet arrives on eth1 with destination x.x.x.36-59 and this packet is not a part of  previously established connection with 192.168.0.0/24 host, it will be destined to a local computer, and filtering this traffic in the INPUT chain would prevent any connection to local computer.

Thank you.
0
 
LVL 6

Accepted Solution

by:
de2Zotjes earned 500 total points
ID: 11920093
1 exactly
2 exactly
3 exactly, you will have to filter the packets based on related/established-state, but I suppose you know how to do that.
0

Featured Post

Microsoft Certification Exam 74-409

Veeam® is happy to provide the Microsoft community with a study guide prepared by MVP and MCT, Orin Thomas. This guide will take you through each of the exam objectives, helping you to prepare for and pass the examination.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

I have seen several blogs and forum entries elsewhere state that because NTFS volumes do not support linux ownership or permissions, they cannot be used for anonymous ftp upload through the vsftpd program.   IT can be done and here's how to get i…
Note: for this to work properly you need to use a Cross-Over network cable. 1. Connect both servers S1 and S2 on the second network slots respectively. Note that you can use the 1st slots but usually these would be occupied by the Service Provide…
If you're a developer or IT admin, you’re probably tasked with managing multiple websites, servers, applications, and levels of security on a daily basis. While this can be extremely time consuming, it can also be frustrating when systems aren't wor…
Monitoring a network: how to monitor network services and why? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the philosophy behind service monitoring and why a handshake validation is critical in network monitoring. Software utilized …

628 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question