Namespaced constants?

I have a class writtne in Java with a large number of constants that I am currently porting to C#.  I nested the constants in Java so that the code would be a bit more readable:

    public class Class1
   {
        public static final class CONSTANTS
        {
            public static final String CONST1 = "CONST1";
            public static final class NESTED
            {
                public static final String CONST2 = "CONST2";
            }
        }
    }

I can then access the constants using code like:
   
    String strTemp1 = Class1.CONSTANTS.CONST1;
    String strTemp2 = Class1.CONSTNATS.NESTED.CONST2;

How could I do something similar in C#?  I know that C# supports nested classes, but I also notice you cannot declare the class static.  Does this mean every instance will get a separate copy of the class?

I've got only 70 points, and I'm putting them all up.

Thanks,
   Derek
dereklAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Webinar] Streamline your web hosting managementRegister Today

x
 
tinchosConnect With a Mentor Commented:
Hi derekl

If you have an inner class as far as I know, every instance of the base class, will contain an instance of the inner class, but dont forget that static members are not part of the instance of the class, but part of the class itself, so if you have 10 instances of MyClass, each of them will contain it's MyInnerClasses, but there will be only one instance of MyOtherString, as it is defined static.

Hope this helps

Tincho
0
 
tinchosCommented:
Hi Derek

You can always do:

public class MyClass
{
     public const static string MyString = "My String";
     
     public class MyInnerClass
     {
           public const static string MyOtherString = "My Other String";
     }
}

and you would call them using

MyClass.MyString
and MyClass.MyInnerClass.MyOtherString

Hope this helps

Tincho
0
 
dereklAuthor Commented:
Thanks Tincho!  What are the implications of the fact that I cannot declare the inner class Static.  Does this mean every instance of the class I get will contain an instance of the Constants classes?
0
The new generation of project management tools

With monday.com’s project management tool, you can see what everyone on your team is working in a single glance. Its intuitive dashboards are customizable, so you can create systems that work for you.

 
gregoryyoungConnect With a Mentor Commented:
public class MyClass
{
     public const static string MyString = "My String";
     
     public class MyInnerClass
     {
           public const static string MyOtherString = "My Other String";
     }
}


MyClass.MyInnerClass never creates an instance of the first class ... but either way the answer is no, the inner class is bound to the type, not to the instance.
0
 
dereklAuthor Commented:
I think I understand now.  The definition of class MyInnerClass is associated with MyClass.  I won't ever have an instance of MyInnerClass unless I actuall create either from within MyClass or from without as follows:

    MyClass.MyInnerClass = new MyClass.MyInnerClass();
0
 
gregoryyoungCommented:
right.
0
 
tinchosCommented:
That's right
0
 
monkeymoleCommented:
.. and a constuctor marked as private will enforce this.
0
All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.