?
Solved

Is Symantic Antivirus or MacAfee VirusScan a better package

Posted on 2004-09-09
9
Medium Priority
?
2,782 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-04
I have access to both Symantic Antivirus Corporate Edition and McAfee VirusScan Enterprise 8.0i.  Which is the better software to install on Windows XP Professional?  What are the advantages/disadvantages of each?
0
Comment
Question by:poulsena
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
9 Comments
 
LVL 96

Accepted Solution

by:
Lee W, MVP earned 800 total points
ID: 12026617
I've never worked with Symantic (at least not recently or extensively with the corporate edition).  But McAfee has always seemed better to me.  A year ago, when all the worms were being released, McAfee was releasing DAT file updates sometimes multiple times per day.  This meant the product you had installed would clean/protect an infected system.  Symantic on the other hand, took at least a day to come out with the definitions.  They did release a utility to clean the virus and "beta" files for the regular software, but this to me was sloppy and slow.  Hence I've preferred McAfee to this day.

I've heard Symantec has a fantastic management tool for deployment and updating.  

McAfee has a epolicy orchestrator - which I've never used.  I used to download the setup configuration tool (which preconfigures an installer for you), then I would deploy it with Active Directory.  That worked great for me.
0
 
LVL 15

Assisted Solution

by:harleyjd
harleyjd earned 200 total points
ID: 12028429
I have never liked any Symantec product.

I have a 5 year love affair with Trend Micro - I haven't found a product to beat the Neatsuite combo of Officescan, Serverprotect, Scanmail and Interscan Virus Wall for multi level protection...

0
 
LVL 7

Assisted Solution

by:msice
msice earned 300 total points
ID: 12031740
I feel MacAfee is better I have used both (there are issues with both) I have had problems with Symantec crashing Win2K systems.
0
Get real performance insights from real users

Key features:
- Total Pages Views and Load times
- Top Pages Viewed and Load Times
- Real Time Site Page Build Performance
- Users’ Browser and Platform Performance
- Geographic User Breakdown
- And more

 
LVL 96

Assisted Solution

by:Lee W, MVP
Lee W, MVP earned 800 total points
ID: 12032381
I'll also add that MANY software programs want you to disable antivirus software before installing.  I can't speak for Symantec, but with McAfee, I have NEVER done that and NEVER seen a problem with an install because of it.
0
 
LVL 5

Assisted Solution

by:burningmace
burningmace earned 200 total points
ID: 12033980
Neither. McAffee is not very powerful and can really slow you down, Symantec has lots of bugs. I choose Kaspersky Anti-Virus. It's damned good and very fast, I never have a problem with it and it'll find Spyware and Adware too. It even finds new viruses like one I started coding in VB. In fact, it won't let you run/access any virus unless you turn it off.
0
 
LVL 16

Assisted Solution

by:samccarthy
samccarthy earned 500 total points
ID: 12034771
I prefer the Symantec AntiVirus Corporate Edition.  Using both, I fine the Symantec product is very easy to configure, push out to clients or install Stand alone.  I shedule the server to get updates daily from Symantec and for the workstations to check for updates every 6 hours from the AV server.  With all the bugs, viruses, trojans out, none of the networks I have setup with this has ever been compromised, one being a local city government.  

I used to be a McAffee fan, but they were inconsistant.  They have made some ground back in my opinion, however I would still recommend the Symantec Product hands down.
0
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:burningmace
ID: 12110180
Thanks for the 200 points and the A
0
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:Alien3
ID: 12367804
AVP viral toolkit is best Anti-virus I ever had.


0
 

Expert Comment

by:rjkc17
ID: 12488106
We use ePO and McAfee VS 8.0i (upgraded from 7.1) where I work. I maintain the system. I have used Symantec before, and I have to say the ability of ePO combined with VS is awesome. Symantec's management tool wasn't too bad, it was actually layed out a little better... but if you set ePO and VS up correctly it is much more self sufficient. The current version of VS also does a lot of Behavioral blocking and warning (if you choose to warn instead of block). That is very helpful when it comes to worms and mass mailers.

The new version of ePO is a lot more robust as well. It has a rogue system detection and much better AD integration then it had before. It's nice.

I haven't experienced ePO/VS bogging down any machines. You can set the priority level of all of it's processes to whatever suits your environment. Right now we have it set to where it's almost invisible to people when we run full system scans.

I think either system is going to be sufficient as long as you spend the necessary time setting it up and researching your configuration options.

Sorry this is a little dated as a post, I was looking for some ePO questions to see if anyone was having any troubles and I stumbled on this thread.

0

Featured Post

Use Case: Protecting a Hybrid Cloud Infrastructure

Microsoft Azure is rapidly becoming the norm in dynamic IT environments. This document describes the challenges that organizations face when protecting data in a hybrid cloud IT environment and presents a use case to demonstrate how Acronis Backup protects all data.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

SHARE your personal details only on a NEED to basis. Take CHARGE and SECURE your IDENTITY. How do I then PROTECT myself and stay in charge of my own Personal details (and) - MY own WAY...
Container Orchestration platforms empower organizations to scale their apps at an exceptional rate. This is the reason numerous innovation-driven companies are moving apps to an appropriated datacenter wide platform that empowers them to scale at a …
NetCrunch network monitor is a highly extensive platform for network monitoring and alert generation. In this video you'll see a live demo of NetCrunch with most notable features explained in a walk-through manner. You'll also get to know the philos…
In this video, Percona Solution Engineer Dimitri Vanoverbeke discusses why you want to use at least three nodes in a database cluster. To discuss how Percona Consulting can help with your design and architecture needs for your database and infras…
Suggested Courses

762 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question