• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 2346
  • Last Modified:

Extremely urgent datatable refresh

Hi Experts!

I have a server with a SQL server database.   This database contains our live trades for the day, updated in real time.  The size of the table is very small (like a few hundred rows only).

The client machine has a datatable of these trades which loads fine using dataAdapter.Fill.  I want the client datatable to be updated in real time.  

If I call the fill again it doens't work, and I cannot clear the table, just make changes to it to make sure they are in-sync.

What is the best way to do this over the LAN?  Keep in mind I would like this to work as real-time as posssible, however a small delay could be tolerable.

Should i create a second datatable, have it constantly clear and fill on a timer and run code to update one row at a time?  or is there an easier way?

Thanks!!!

0
OptionsMM
Asked:
OptionsMM
1 Solution
 
tomasX2Commented:
You could use a merge...

DataSet latestData = GetLatestData();  // dataAdapter.Fill
clientData.Merge(latestData ,true,System.Data.MissingSchemaAction.Add);

//primary key
clientData.Tables[0].PrimaryKey = new DataColumn[]{clientData.Tables[0].Columns["ID"]};


this would work if the dataset has a primary key on the trades table and the data is inserted and updated only... not deleted... because the deleted rows would not be present in the lastestData and would not get deleted in the clientData dataset..

if you want to get rid of the deleted rows you could loop through the new clientData and check if the row exists in the latestData
To get rid of the deleted rows...
                        System.Collections.Specialized.StringCollection col = new System.Collections.Specialized.StringCollection();

                        foreach( DataRow row in clientData.Tables[0].Rows )
                        {
                              if( latestData.Tables[0].Rows.Select("ID='" + row["ID"].ToString() + "'").Length == 0 )
                              {
                                                                                                // Add to the collection of rows to be deleted.....
                                    col.Add(row["ID"].ToString());
                              }
                        }

                        foreach( string id in col )
                        {
                              clientData.Tables[0].Rows.Find(id).Delete();                              
                        }



0
 
rama_krishna580Commented:
Hi,

Look at this example, it may help you to sort your problem..
http://www.akadia.com/services/dotnet_update_form.html

R.K
0
 
JigitCommented:
I can suggest usage of locks: when a row(record) is being opened for editing it must be locked in the database. When it's being saved the changes are immidiately updated in the database and the lock is removed. When user searches some row by some criterias, there will be access to the database. It this approach, there will be a little bit more accesses to the SQL server, but there will be two main advantages: 1) the data is always synced and up-to-date, 2) there will never be collision between two different client users updating the same record. You said that database volume is not big, so the overhead will be acceptable.

HTH,
Jigit
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: SSL Checker

Scans your site and returns information about your SSL implementation and certificate. Helpful for debugging and validating your SSL configuration.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now