# Xor in .NET, vs "^" in Javascript

When I do this in javascript:

3988292384 ^ 0

I get this:

-306674912

HOWEVER, in VB.net, when I evaluate 3988292384 Xor 0, I get 3988292384.

What's going on?
###### Who is Participating?

Commented:
OK, I think I know exactly what happened (didn't realize that until started coding)

the value 3988292384 (dec) is 0xEDB88320 (hex). It's greater than 0x7FFFFFFF, so it should be considered negative value. The normal integer (31 bits value + 1 bit sign) type can't hold this value, however an unsigned integer (32 bits value) type can. So in order to preserve the sign of your input, JavaScript is treating this variable as a long (63 bits + 1 bit sign = 0xFFFFFFFFEDB88320). The way JavaScript performs the XOR operation seems to be weird. Order of value type conversions is not intuitive at the first glance. The XOR operation took 2 agruments of different types - the big number (64 bits) and zero (32 bits) and performed the XOR-ing only on the lower 32 bits, leaving the rest untact.

I don't know how do you want to use the XOR in your code, but I think that the System.Collections.BitArray can help you with the Xor method. I wouldn't emulate the misbehaving code in order to translate from one language to another...
0

Commented:
Maybe a hexadecimal mode will help:

3988292384 is 0x00000000EDB88320
-306674912 is 0xFFFFFFFFEDB88320

So JavaScript seems to convert the number to 64-bit form and do something weird about it, while VB does not.

HTH
0

Author Commented:
Very good observation! If you can figure out how I can emulate the behavior in .NET, you get all the points. (I don't deal much with bitwise and hex operations, so I'm a bit out of my depth.)
0

Commented:
Do you need to implement the JS behavior in .NET, or to implement .NET behavior in JS? Just to be sure before I code :)
0

Author Commented:
The js behavior in .NET. I'm converting javascript code. Thanks!
0

Commented:
Sorry, I seem to have only the C# compiler installed on this machine. If you would go for the C# code, I could try and implement it in C#, but I can't do it in VB.NET right now.
0

Author Commented:
C# is fine.
0

Author Commented:
Okay, well that helps a good deal. Thanks!
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.