SED command

Hi,

When I run this:

echo 1_2_spell.xml | sed 's/\([^\_]*\)\_\([^\_]*\.xml\)/\1.\2/'

I got the result :

1_2.spell.xml

How do I change the sed command switches to make it come out with:

1.2_spell.xml

instead?

Thanks.
CM
hocheemingAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
dReichelConnect With a Mentor Commented:
Oh - sorry :)

echo 12_34.Abc.xml
echo 12_34.Abc.xml | sed -e 's/\([0-9]\+\)_\([0-9]\+\)\.\([^0-9]\+\)\.xml/\1.\2_\3.xml/'

I tested it and it does produce

12.34_Abc.xml

Going back to your original question, the above script will transform 1_2_spell.xml to 1.2_spell.xml  Hopefully it will reject unwanted matches.
0
 
avizitCommented:
echo 1_2_spell.xml | sed 's/\([^\_]*\)\_\([^\_]*\)\_\([^\_\.]*\)\.xml/\1.\2\_\3\.xml/'


seems to work
0
 
pjedmondCommented:
Not sure what you are trying to do here?

But this works:

echo 1_2_spell.xml | sed 's/_/\1./'

...perhaps a more comprehensive example of the stream and manipulation required would be helpful?...or are we going for an obfusication award?

0
Free Tool: IP Lookup

Get more info about an IP address or domain name, such as organization, abuse contacts and geolocation.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

 
pjedmondCommented:
..or even:

echo 1_2_spell.xml | sed 's/_/./'

as long as you don't stipulat the g (global obtion, only the first _ will be substituted!
0
 
hocheemingAuthor Commented:
How can I make a check in the characters between the "_" to be numeric?

For exp:

1_2_spell.xml convert 1.2_spell.xml

but for

1700_command_spell.xml (ignore: dun convert as "command" is non numeric)

Thanks.
0
 
avizitCommented:
check for numeric as  

[0-9]+
0
 
dReichelCommented:
echo 12.34_Abc.xml
echo 12.34_Abc.xml | sed -e 's/\([0-9]\+\)\.\([0-9]\+\)_\([^0-9]\+\)\.xml/\1_\2.\3.xml/'
0
 
hocheemingAuthor Commented:
It gives :

12_34.Abc.xml

I need:

12.34_Abc.xml

Please advise.

Thanks.
CM
0
 
pjedmondCommented:
I would have thought that my solution and that of avizit also did what was required. The check for numbers was an additional insight.

Anyway - your call:)
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.