Solved

Web Development process order

Posted on 2004-09-23
3
135 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-25
Hello Expert,

    In your opinion what is the best way to develop a graphically cool yet structurally sound web site using Macromedia?


Is it to create a png file in fireworks, slice it up, and then export the html to dreamweaver?

Or should I actually start in dreamweaver, and use fireworks when needed?

(please help, points goes to the best explantion not the longest.)
0
Comment
Question by:Tertioptus
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
3 Comments
 
LVL 10

Accepted Solution

by:
rockmansattic earned 30 total points
ID: 12142919
Totally depends on your intend and content.

Fireworks for the design would produce the better graphically pleasing site.  This way, you can create a good, 3d looking site, with cool graphics.

BUT if your content is constantly changing and many of the pages are long (such as a search results), then you can start with DW and go from there.

I prefer somwhere in the middle.
If I am looking to a graphically intense site, I will start by creating it in Fireworks and then slicing it up, and only exporting some fof the images, Then I would start from scratch in DW and place the images where I want them, using CSS and other methods that suit the situation.

Hope this helps.
Rockman
0
 
LVL 14

Assisted Solution

by:Esopo
Esopo earned 25 total points
ID: 12148568
Putting it all together in DW generally requires some hand code. I usually make a 800 or 1024 width site in Fireworks and then export the chunks manually.

The idea is that by hand coding the site I can set percentage widths, scripting, etc. altogether with the graphics from Fireworks.
0
 

Assisted Solution

by:WebDebz
WebDebz earned 20 total points
ID: 12175320
In my opinion and practice, I have always done my site design/layout in Fireworks first.

While creating the interface I take special care to name all slices descriptively, add ALT tages, add links and rollovers effects.    I then export to DreamWeaver.  I never use all of the resulting code, I can't stand the way the program formats tables.  I create my own table beneath the original based on my layout and then move the graphical elements into their approprate places.   I never recycle any of the original table.  This allows for DreamWeaver to do all the rollover coding for your graphics, but will result in a MCUH more stable interface.
0

Featured Post

Announcing the Most Valuable Experts of 2016

MVEs are more concerned with the satisfaction of those they help than with the considerable points they can earn. They are the types of people you feel privileged to call colleagues. Join us in honoring this amazing group of Experts.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

I still run into .cgi files every now and then. In some instances, I actually prefer the simplicity of a .cgi script to other options. Since I use DreamWeaver extensively, what I needed was a way to open .cgi scripts in Dreamweaver. And I wanted to …
This article is very specific and is only intended to help if you are installing Dreamweaver 8 in a Windows 7 environment with Office 2007 installed.   I'm not sure why Microsoft tends to release OS' that should not be released but they do.  Windows…
Finding and deleting duplicate (picture) files can be a time consuming task. My wife and I, our three kids and their families all share one dilemma: Managing our pictures. Between desktops, laptops, phones, tablets, and cameras; over the last decade…

738 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question