Solved

BGP vs Appliance?

Posted on 2004-09-28
6
2,352 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-16
According to Cisco I am an Expert in BGP. However, we're in a postion at our company where we can either dual-home and "load balance"(sometimes a myth) using BGP or purchase an appliance(RadWare, FatPipe, F5, etc...). I know the advantges of running bgp over those applicances which in my opinion create more work and complexity. I just need some advantages of running bgp other than its cheaper(assuming you have a router) and you have more control. From what i understand, most of these appliances are garbage.

0
Comment
Question by:AaronLeiberman
  • 4
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 79

Expert Comment

by:lrmoore
ID: 12172757
Personal opinion only here, but you asked:
BGP is used extensively for this purpose and works very well for dual-homing and load balancing. You have the expertise in-house, and the router IOS comes with BGP at no extra cost. Assuming that you also own your own IP subnet and have your own BGP AS number, why on earth would you want to throw in another piece of hardware that is just supposed to 'magically' load balance without using BGP? The whole purpose of having multi-homed connections and redundancy is to reduce the single points of failure. Why in heck would you put some device out front and CREATE another single point of failure?

MCI engineers like the FatPipes, so there must be something to it. If you don't have an IP address block and BGP AS number already, the cost of getting that setup vs the cost of the FatPipes is about a wash, and if you don't have the inhouse expertise in BGP, the extra consulting $$ can add up.

I'd say you already have the best situation, most cost effective, and highest ROI of any potential alternative using a 3rd party hardware device.
0
 

Author Comment

by:AaronLeiberman
ID: 12172895
Thanks I agree. Do you know anything about Cisco OER(Optimizer Edge Routing)? This device is suppose to be assist with the limitation of BGP where by default BGP alone will not chose the best path based on latency, delay, jitter, etc etc. Basiclly the device creates a iBGP neighbor with your edge dual-homed router. It runs its own tests on the above mentioned criteria(and a few other besides latency, delay, etc.) detemines which is the best provider and then injects the route to your edge router along with a prefered local preference attribute. Let me know if you've heard of this new Cisco product and what your thoughts are. I think sounds like a decent idea that is basically an extension to bgp. Let me know your thoughs. Thanks again.
0
 
LVL 79

Expert Comment

by:lrmoore
ID: 12172955
This is one that I have not heard of yet. I have, however, been playing around with SAA, Service Assurance Agent, to adjust routing based on availability of an upstream host (ie. if my ISP loses it's peering connection, my interface stays up, but I'm bound to only what we can reach within the same ISP) so that if I lose that connectivity, I can swing my default to an alternate ISP without using BGP. Lots of potential with this. Search CCO for "SAA routing" and you'll find several good articles.

Bottom line, there are several Cisco methods to achieve the goal without adding some unknown 3rd party device into the fray.

BTW, what IS your exact goal/mandate?

0
Control application downtime with dependency maps

Visualize the interdependencies between application components better with Applications Manager's automated application discovery and dependency mapping feature. Resolve performance issues faster by quickly isolating problematic components.

 

Author Comment

by:AaronLeiberman
ID: 12174233
redundancy and best path.
0
 
LVL 79

Expert Comment

by:lrmoore
ID: 12174835
What is your gut feeling? Unfortunately I don't know anyone who has actually put any of these devices in place to get first-hand reaction on their performance.

What WAN technology(s) are you using? T1? DS3? Multiple ISPs? How many lines do you have? Do you host publicly accessible servers (inbound IP requirements)? Where are your single points of failure now? How do you mitigate them? How much will redundant/best path WAN links give you in terms of uptime of those servers/services that must be up? What will you have to give up in your budget and do without if you go with something like the FatPipes?

There are lots of ways to spin it.


0
 
LVL 79

Accepted Solution

by:
lrmoore earned 500 total points
ID: 12221335
Are you still working on/ thinking about this? Can you close out this question?

Thanks!
0

Featured Post

Free camera licenses with purchase of My Cloud NAS

Milestone Arcus software is compatible with thousands of industry-leading cameras for added flexibility. Upon installation on your My Cloud NAS, you will receive two (2) camera licenses already enabled in the software. And for a limited time, get additional camera licenses FREE.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Let’s list some of the technologies that enable smooth teleworking. 
PRTG Network Monitor lets you monitor your bandwidth usage, so you know who is using up your bandwidth, and what they're using it for.
Internet Business Fax to Email Made Easy - With  eFax Corporate (http://www.enterprise.efax.com), you'll receive a dedicated online fax number, which is used the same way as a typical analog fax number. You'll receive secure faxes in your email, f…
Here's a very brief overview of the methods PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) offers for monitoring bandwidth, to help you decide which methods you´d like to investigate in more detail.  The methods are covered in more detail in o…

911 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

26 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now