?
Solved

Getting a value from Standard Dev, and Mean

Posted on 2004-09-29
8
Medium Priority
?
528 Views
Last Modified: 2008-02-01
Hi all,

I have the Mean and Standard Deviation of a variable. This variable is cost, and this will vary for each entity. Using the mean and SD can someone tell me how I would create a random number based on lognormal.

For example if the SD is 1 and the mean is 50, I would expect the result to produce (mainly) between 49 and 51. (I understand that this isnt always true by the very nature of the curve).

I am making the tool in Java, which contains method nextGaussian() to return a random number normal distrubution between 0 and 1.

Many thanks,

H
0
Comment
Question by:wazdaka
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 3
  • 2
8 Comments
 

Author Comment

by:wazdaka
ID: 12183525
sorry, nextGaussian() uses mean 0.0 and SD 1. Not sure if this helps at all.
0
 
LVL 27

Accepted Solution

by:
d-glitch earned 500 total points
ID: 12184010
[Your Mean]  + [Your SD] * nextGaussian()      should give you what you want
0
 
LVL 27

Expert Comment

by:d-glitch
ID: 12184101
nextGaussian() should give you a normal curve centered around zero with SD = 1

Multiplying by  [Your SD] spreads (or shrinks) the width of the curve.

Adding [Your Mean]  shifts the curve up to where you want it centered.

You may have to check for negative values:  If your mean was 5 and your SD is one, nextGaussin() will return values <5 once every million calls.
0
What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

 
LVL 27

Expert Comment

by:d-glitch
ID: 12184119
You may have to check for negative values:  If your mean was 5 and your SD is one, nextGaussin() will return values < -5 once every million calls.

That's negative 5.
0
 

Author Comment

by:wazdaka
ID: 12184452
Perfect, thank you very much. I should always be shifting the curve up enough to not worry about negatives bu I'll take the absolute value of the result just in case.

Thanks again

H
0
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:wytcom
ID: 12184545
A lower level, more work but more flexibility, approach is to generate a uniformly distributed random number and then project it onto the gaussian distribution to find the corresponding gaussian coordinate.  This isn't too hard to do:

Generate a uniformly distributed number x where  0 <= u < 1

Set the number of standard deviations you want to cover in your gaussian: Nsd = 40

Set a left bound for the range of your Gaussian distribution: gl = m - sd*Nsd

Set a right bound for the range of your Gaussian distribution: gr = m + sd*Nsd

Set the number of intervals to divide the Gaussian distribution into: N = 200

Set the initial coordinate to g = gl

Set the interval to dg = (gr - gl)/N

Write a subroutine to return the height of the gaussian given the coordinate value g (as well as the mean and standard deviation) = G(g)

Now start at the left bound and begin to sum the value of the Gaussian curve at coordinate g = gl.  Increment g = gl + dg and accumulate G(g) into the sum.  So far we have sum = G(gl) + G(gl + dg) ...

Continue this summation until the sum is greater than or equal to u (your uniformly distributed random number).  The last value of g used is the gaussian coordinate sought.

The idea here is that the integration over the guassian distribution gives the probability of occurence of coordinate less than or equal to g.  We simply sum here as our approximate integration.

This technique can be applied to any distribution you need, not just the gaussian.
0
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:wytcom
ID: 12184553
Oops:  

Generate a uniformly distributed number x where  0 <= u < 1

   should be

Generate a uniformly distributed number u where  0 <= u < 1
0
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:wytcom
ID: 12190933
Oops:

Continue this summation until the sum is greater than or equal to u (your uniformly distributed random number).

  should be

Continue this summation until the sum*dg is greater than or equal to u (your uniformly distributed random number).
0

Featured Post

Want to be a Web Developer? Get Certified Today!

Enroll in the Certified Web Development Professional course package to learn HTML, Javascript, and PHP. Build a solid foundation to work toward your dream job!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Introduction On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate our Product? Many of us have answered that question time and time again. But only a few of us have had the pleasure of receiving a stack of the filled out surveys and being asked to do somethi…
Foreword (May 2015) This web page has appeared at Google.  It's definitely worth considering! https://www.google.com/about/careers/students/guide-to-technical-development.html How to Know You are Making a Difference at EE In August, 2013, one …
This is a video describing the growing solar energy use in Utah. This is a topic that greatly interests me and so I decided to produce a video about it.
Finds all prime numbers in a range requested and places them in a public primes() array. I've demostrated a template size of 30 (2 * 3 * 5) but larger templates can be built such 210  (2 * 3 * 5 * 7) or 2310  (2 * 3 * 5 * 7 * 11). The larger templa…
Suggested Courses

800 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question