Improve company productivity with a Business Account.Sign Up

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 437
  • Last Modified:

Cisco 2610

Hi
I need to open a port for terminal server(3389) on the Cisco router,if i do a port scan i can see that 25,80 are open.If i have a look at the access-list,it tell me -permit any!
The Cisco router's Ver 12.2(12.14)
Any Idea's?
0
AlexBrone
Asked:
AlexBrone
  • 4
  • 3
1 Solution
 
scampgbCommented:
Hi AlexBrone,
It would really help if you could post a copy of the current router config.
You can get this with "show run"

Thanks
0
 
AlexBroneAuthor Commented:

!
ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer0 overload
ip nat inside source static tcp 80.000.000.000 25 80.001.001.001 25 extendable
ip nat inside source static tcp 80.000.000.000 80 80.001.001.001 80 extendable

ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0
no ip http server
!
!
access-list 1 deny   80.001.001.001
access-list 1 permit any
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
!
call rsvp-sync
!
!
mgcp profile default
!
!
!
dial-peer cor custom
!
!
!
!
line con 0
line aux 0
line vty 0 4

end
0
 
scampgbCommented:
AlexBrone,
> ip nat inside source static tcp 80.000.000.000 80 80.001.001.001 80 extendable

I take it that the "80" numbers above have been faked, and actually one set it an external range and one is internal?

You need to add a line of:
ip nat inside source static tcp 80.000.000.000 3389 80.001.001.001 3389 extendable

Basically - add a line like the ones you've already got, but allowing port TCP/3389
0
Free Tool: IP Lookup

Get more info about an IP address or domain name, such as organization, abuse contacts and geolocation.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

 
AlexBroneAuthor Commented:
Hi
I made the changes earlier,but did not fix the problem!
I have relaod the router and the change did take affect but the port is still closed!
0
 
scampgbCommented:
Sorry - just noticed that you accepted my answer.

Is this now working?


0
 
AlexBroneAuthor Commented:
Yup,firewall was blocking the port!

Thank you

0
 
scampgbCommented:
*grin*  They're supposed to do that ;-)

Glad I could help :-)


0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Free Tool: Port Scanner

Check which ports are open to the outside world. Helps make sure that your firewall rules are working as intended.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

  • 4
  • 3
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now