Solved

Cisco 2610

Posted on 2004-09-30
7
382 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-17
Hi
I need to open a port for terminal server(3389) on the Cisco router,if i do a port scan i can see that 25,80 are open.If i have a look at the access-list,it tell me -permit any!
The Cisco router's Ver 12.2(12.14)
Any Idea's?
0
Comment
Question by:AlexBrone
  • 4
  • 3
7 Comments
 
LVL 15

Accepted Solution

by:
scampgb earned 500 total points
Comment Utility
Hi AlexBrone,
It would really help if you could post a copy of the current router config.
You can get this with "show run"

Thanks
0
 

Author Comment

by:AlexBrone
Comment Utility

!
ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer0 overload
ip nat inside source static tcp 80.000.000.000 25 80.001.001.001 25 extendable
ip nat inside source static tcp 80.000.000.000 80 80.001.001.001 80 extendable

ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0
no ip http server
!
!
access-list 1 deny   80.001.001.001
access-list 1 permit any
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
!
call rsvp-sync
!
!
mgcp profile default
!
!
!
dial-peer cor custom
!
!
!
!
line con 0
line aux 0
line vty 0 4

end
0
 
LVL 15

Expert Comment

by:scampgb
Comment Utility
AlexBrone,
> ip nat inside source static tcp 80.000.000.000 80 80.001.001.001 80 extendable

I take it that the "80" numbers above have been faked, and actually one set it an external range and one is internal?

You need to add a line of:
ip nat inside source static tcp 80.000.000.000 3389 80.001.001.001 3389 extendable

Basically - add a line like the ones you've already got, but allowing port TCP/3389
0
6 Surprising Benefits of Threat Intelligence

All sorts of threat intelligence is available on the web. Intelligence you can learn from, and use to anticipate and prepare for future attacks.

 

Author Comment

by:AlexBrone
Comment Utility
Hi
I made the changes earlier,but did not fix the problem!
I have relaod the router and the change did take affect but the port is still closed!
0
 
LVL 15

Expert Comment

by:scampgb
Comment Utility
Sorry - just noticed that you accepted my answer.

Is this now working?


0
 

Author Comment

by:AlexBrone
Comment Utility
Yup,firewall was blocking the port!

Thank you

0
 
LVL 15

Expert Comment

by:scampgb
Comment Utility
*grin*  They're supposed to do that ;-)

Glad I could help :-)


0

Featured Post

How to run any project with ease

Manage projects of all sizes how you want. Great for personal to-do lists, project milestones, team priorities and launch plans.
- Combine task lists, docs, spreadsheets, and chat in one
- View and edit from mobile/offline
- Cut down on emails

Join & Write a Comment

We've been using the Cisco/Linksys RV042 for years as: - an internet Gateway - a site-to-site VPN device - a leased line site-to-site subnet-to-subnet interface (And, here I'm assuming that any RV0xx behaves the same way as an RV042.  So that's …
Problem Description:   Couple of months ago we upgraded the ADSL line at our branch office from Home to Business line. The purpose of transforming the service to have static public IP’s. We were in need for public IP’s to publish our web resour…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…

763 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

13 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now