Solved

Best way to cleanly terminate a hanging com interop call

Posted on 2004-09-30
3
221 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-05
I'm calling a 3rd party COM+ component from a C# program via the COM interop library.  To accomplish this, I've added a reference to the 3rd party library to my C# project.   The code looks something like this:

ThirdPartyClass myObj = new ThirdPartyClass();
myObj.ThirdPartyMethod ("myFile.JPG");    // call 3rd party method

The 3rd party component is an image processing library.  Every now and then the call to ThirdPartyMethod "hangs" if  I call it with a corrupt JPEG file.  (I know the file is corrupt because both Picture Viewer and Paint display an error when they try to open it).   I'm processing a ton of images and every now and then one of them will cause this problem.  I'm working with the vendor to get the problem fixed.

In the meantime....  is there any way I can safely timeout and abort the ThirtdPartyMethod call? The obvious thing to do is to wrap the ThirdPartyMethod call in a separate thread, set a timer and abort the thread when the timer pops.  But I wonder how that affects the process which is hosting the COM object?  I would think that it would continue to process the method call which means that I've just moved the problem rather than solved it.

0
Comment
Question by:wile_e_coyote
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 18

Expert Comment

by:armoghan
ID: 12197692
You can do these lines in a thread

ThirdPartyClass myObj = new ThirdPartyClass();
myObj.ThirdPartyMethod ("myFile.JPG");    

and start a timer in the main thread, if the response doesnot come from the thread in a given interval, distroy the thread
0
 
LVL 4

Author Comment

by:wile_e_coyote
ID: 12198785
armoghan - Thanks and I agree, but as I understand the COM Interop architecture (and maybe I'm confused), the 3rd party component is actually being hosted in a separate process.  When the thread is destroyed does the component continue to execute anyway?
0
 
LVL 18

Accepted Solution

by:
armoghan earned 500 total points
ID: 12199086
Yes may be !. But it will not hang your system atleast, and garbage collector will take that object away..
If there is no way in COM object that this is the best you can do ..


Unless and untill the third party COM has provided it as multithreaded or some async mechanism to stop it
0

Featured Post

Networking for the Cloud Era

Join Microsoft and Riverbed for a discussion and demonstration of enhancements to SteelConnect:
-One-click orchestration and cloud connectivity in Azure environments
-Tight integration of SD-WAN and WAN optimization capabilities
-Scalability and resiliency equal to a data center

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Introduction This article series is supposed to shed some light on the use of IDisposable and objects that inherit from it. In essence, a more apt title for this article would be: using (IDisposable) {}. I’m just not sure how many people would ge…
Real-time is more about the business, not the technology. In day-to-day life, to make real-time decisions like buying or investing, business needs the latest information(e.g. Gold Rate/Stock Rate). Unlike traditional days, you need not wait for a fe…
This video shows how to quickly and easily add an email signature for all users on Exchange 2016. The resulting signature is applied on a server level by Exchange Online. The email signature template has been downloaded from: www.mail-signatures…
In a recent question (https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/29004105/Run-AutoHotkey-script-directly-from-Notepad.html) here at Experts Exchange, a member asked how to run an AutoHotkey script (.AHK) directly from Notepad++ (aka NPP). This video…

830 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question