?
Solved

Raid 5 or Raid 1 for file server and exchange server

Posted on 2004-10-04
6
Medium Priority
?
234 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-05
I have already purchased a raid 5 server with 4 SCSI drives on a perc4-dc card. I was planning on using this server for running exchange on. Our mail storage size is around 8 gigs. So its not very much. Would I see any performance gain at all if I was to go with a raid 1 setup instead for my exchange server? I have been told with small databases and mostly read and very little write to the hard disk that raid 5 is the best option. How big does my database file need to reach before it become beneficial to go with raid 1.

Also, I need a file server. Mostly I see people using raid 5 for file servers. Would I be better off using raid 1 or raid 5 for this file server. This is for a new company with only a few employees. This server will also double as a domain controller. I was thinking that if I was better off using raid 1 in the exchange server I could then use the raid 5 server for my file server.

Thanks,
DMS
0
Comment
Question by:DMS-X
6 Comments
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:zvitam
ID: 12222333
You may find the following thread useful.

http://www.experts-exchange.com/Hardware/Q_20639126.html

0
 
LVL 5

Assisted Solution

by:XSINUX
XSINUX earned 400 total points
ID: 12222876
Servers dedicated for File share , the best way is to have a Raid 5. You will meet performance with redundancy. The strip the data on the number of hdds on the array and with a parity. --> Best Suggested is RAID 5

Going for Raid 1 would have Data Tolerance but the performance is compromised.

On RAID 0 there is no Data Redundancy. ( Striping without parity )  If one of the hdd fails in this array all of your data is lost. But performance is the max. Use it only if you have a good backup.
0
 
LVL 18

Assisted Solution

by:Steve McCarthy, MCSE, MCSA, MCP x8, Network+, i-Net+, A+, CIWA, CCNA, FDLE FCIC, HIPAA Security Officer
Steve McCarthy, MCSE, MCSA, MCP x8, Network+, i-Net+, A+, CIWA, CCNA, FDLE FCIC, HIPAA Security Officer earned 800 total points
ID: 12223055
Bang for the buck, Raid 5 is a better way to go and will give you a small performance increase over Raid 1.  For the absolute best in redundancy where you cannot suffer a speed loss if you lose a drive, Raid 1 is the way to go.   I run all my servers, DC's, Exchange and File all on a Raid 5 array.  For the size you are looking at, you, me and the fence post will not see a speed difference.
0
NEW Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows

Backup and recover physical and cloud-based servers and workstations, as well as endpoint devices that belong to remote users. Avoid downtime and data loss quickly and easily for Windows-based physical or public cloud-based workloads!

 
LVL 8

Accepted Solution

by:
x86fix earned 800 total points
ID: 12223529
I like Raid 5 best for the file server, it handles the multiple requests better and you will see the best bang for the buck with that.  The Exchange is not going to be that taxed based on the size you describe - the mirror should be fine.  The other advantage to Raid 5 is that it is easy to increase size, and typically the file server is the one that needs to be increased.  
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:DMS-X
ID: 12229952
>The other advantage to Raid 5 is that it is easy to increase size, and typically the file server is the one that needs to be increased.
Very good pint x86fix, thanks.

>Bang for the buck, Raid 5 is a better way to go and will give you a small performance increase over Raid 1.
samccarthy, I always heard different, I always read that raid 1 is better performance than raid 5. Raid 5 for bigger files and reading the disks while raid 1 is better for bigger files and writing to the disk. But were talking about milliseconds here : )

>Going for Raid 1 would have Data Tolerance but the performance is compromised.
Thats 3 people against me when I say raid 1 has better performance. I guess I am wrong!

Thanks guys!
0
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:elconomeno
ID: 12229977
defentitly use RAID5

RAID5 and raid 1 are both fault tolerant for disk crashes.
RAID5 needs a litle more time when writing information to the disks.
If we talk about Reading then both give almost the same result in performance
RAID5 is more expandeble then RAID1
so choose RAID5
for example :
in my company we use only RAID1 for Application Servers and RAID5 for Mail and File Server



0

Featured Post

Eye-catchers on the conference table

Challenge: The i-unit group was not satisfied with the audio quality during remote meetings. They were looking for a portable solution with excellent audio quality for use in their conference room but also at their client’s offices.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article outlines why you need to choose a backup solution that protects your entire environment – including your VMware ESXi and Microsoft Hyper-V virtualization hosts – not just your virtual machines.
If you're a modern-day technology professional, you may be wondering if certifications are really necessary. They are. Here's why.
Integration Management Part 2
With just a little bit of  SQL and VBA, many doors open to cool things like synchronize a list box to display data relevant to other information on a form.  If you have never written code or looked at an SQL statement before, no problem! ...  give i…
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month14 days, 10 hours left to enroll

839 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question