Solved

string comparisons

Posted on 2004-10-04
4
209 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-01
Hi if I define two strings s1,s2 why can't I use strcmp(s1,s2) ?

however I can check if (s1==s2) but what about comparing abel and ABel in this case (s1==s2) doesn't work.

Are there any functions that convert a string to lower case or upper case.

I solved this by using strcmp (s1.c_str(),s2.c_str()) but in case of using long arrays of string won't that be an overhead to covert s1 to s1.c_str()

0
Comment
Question by:anshuma
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 3

Assisted Solution

by:Indrawati
Indrawati earned 150 total points
ID: 12223095
Simple answer:

#include <algorithm>
(for_each(a.begin(), a.end(), tolower) == for_each(b.begin(), b.end(), tolower))

will do case-insensitive comparison.

For another way to do it, you may look at GoTW #29:
http://www.gotw.ca/gotw/029.htm
0
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:Indrawati
ID: 12223134
Sorry, the last answer should be:

      string a = "ABEL";
      string b = "abel";

      transform(a.begin(), a.end(), a.begin(), tolower);
      transform(b.begin(), b.end(), b.begin(), tolower);
      cout << a == b;

I confused transform() with for_each()... again.
0
 
LVL 55

Accepted Solution

by:
Jaime Olivares earned 50 total points
ID: 12223195
> I solved this by using strcmp (s1.c_str(),s2.c_str()) but in case of using long arrays of string won't that be an overhead
> to covert s1 to s1.c_str()
Actually there is not conversion, just some **arrangements** to give you a pointer to the string buffer, ensuring it is null terminated to be handled correctly by functions like strcmp() or stricmp().

0
 
LVL 39

Assisted Solution

by:itsmeandnobodyelse
itsmeandnobodyelse earned 50 total points
ID: 12225059
std::string isn't very comfortable regarding case insensitivity and other regular string functionality. Mostly, it's because std::string is a template class but case sensitivity easily could be handled only for (ASCII) char type.

You may help yourself by defining an own operator== function like that:

bool operator== (const string& s1, const string& s2)
{
    return stricmp(s1.c_str(), s2.c_str()) == 0;
}

The disadvantage is that you've to put the definition to any IDE you or others are working with code depending on that feature.

Regards, Alex


0

Featured Post

DevOps Toolchain Recommendations

Read this Gartner Research Note and discover how your IT organization can automate and optimize DevOps processes using a toolchain architecture.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Often, when implementing a feature, you won't know how certain events should be handled at the point where they occur and you'd rather defer to the user of your function or class. For example, a XML parser will extract a tag from the source code, wh…
Many modern programming languages support the concept of a property -- a class member that combines characteristics of both a data member and a method.  These are sometimes called "smart fields" because you can add logic that is applied automaticall…
The viewer will learn how to user default arguments when defining functions. This method of defining functions will be contrasted with the non-default-argument of defining functions.
The viewer will be introduced to the member functions push_back and pop_back of the vector class. The video will teach the difference between the two as well as how to use each one along with its functionality.

809 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question