Solved

reference calling object

Posted on 2004-10-04
12
183 Views
Last Modified: 2010-03-31
Is there a (reasonable) way to reference the calling object without explicitly passing "this". Or in other words, does the called object know who called it?

Thanks!



0
Comment
Question by:adg
  • 4
  • 4
  • 2
  • +1
12 Comments
 
LVL 92

Expert Comment

by:objects
ID: 12223590
no
0
 
LVL 3

Author Comment

by:adg
ID: 12223605
Thats what I thought.
0
 
LVL 24

Expert Comment

by:sciuriware
ID: 12224186
There should be a way digging in the assembly code.
But, what's the purpose?
;JOOP!
0
Announcing the Most Valuable Experts of 2016

MVEs are more concerned with the satisfaction of those they help than with the considerable points they can earn. They are the types of people you feel privileged to call colleagues. Join us in honoring this amazing group of Experts.

 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:tomboshell
ID: 12224234
Could throw and catch an exception and parse the trace, then use some reflection.
0
 
LVL 92

Expert Comment

by:objects
ID: 12224276
> Could throw and catch an exception and parse the trace

that'd only get you the method, not the object.
0
 
LVL 24

Assisted Solution

by:sciuriware
sciuriware earned 20 total points
ID: 12224338
Well, this way of working would reveal the classes.
But still not the object itself.
;JOOP!
0
 
LVL 7

Assisted Solution

by:tomboshell
tomboshell earned 30 total points
ID: 12224371
If it is simply to identify what called it then that is good.  If it is desired to invoke methods on the caller then it of course would not work that well, except for final static methods and such.  Since the trace-to-reflection route would create a new object and not the calling object, but it would be an object of the same class/type.  
That would be a kinda crazy way and due to the reflection not the best for performance, so a call back object being passed to the class is the best for such purposes.  But it could be fun! And also provide lots of entertainment by debugging and maintaining.
0
 
LVL 92

Expert Comment

by:objects
ID: 12224392
> but it would be an object of the same class/type.  

but very different state.
and how would you create it?
0
 
LVL 3

Author Comment

by:adg
ID: 12224945
Wow, I hadn't realized all these nuances. In this case, I'm just interested in identifying the class of the caller. But I know that isn't exactly what I asked (because I didn't know any better).

>> But it could be fun! And also provide lots of entertainment by debugging and maintaining
Hah, just what I need!

I'm going to raise the points and split them. Thanks for all your help!
0
 
LVL 92

Accepted Solution

by:
objects earned 50 total points
ID: 12224988
try this:

StackTraceElement[] trace = new Exception().getStackTrace();
String classname = trace[trace.length-2].getClassName();
0
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:tomboshell
ID: 12225227
Thanks for the grade!

>> how would you create it?  
I would have to be a bit obtuse and say that it depends.  could do a classForName or use the class loader (hopefully it is the same) or use findClass(String name), could access a helper class (or a factory) with the string name, which I think would be preferrable.  It depends on where the class is and what constructors are available, if it is that person's class or a library, if it allows for construction outside of the package, what parameters if any, and prob other considerations that I did not mention.

>> but very different state.
I know, that is why it is not a very good way of reference, but it may be good just to get the name.  Otherwise, if it is just for knoweldge I would say to use a debugger and set a breakpoint at the part in the code that is of interest.
0
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:tomboshell
ID: 12235392
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Site Down Detector

Helpful to verify reports of your own downtime, or to double check a downed website you are trying to access.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

For customizing the look of your lightweight component and making it look opaque like it was made of plastic.  This tip assumes your component to be of rectangular shape and completely opaque.   (CODE)
INTRODUCTION Working with files is a moderately common task in Java.  For most projects hard coding the file names, using parameters in configuration files, or using command-line arguments is sufficient.   However, when your application has vi…
Video by: Michael
Viewers learn about how to reduce the potential repetitiveness of coding in main by developing methods to perform specific tasks for their program. Additionally, objects are introduced for the purpose of learning how to call methods in Java. Define …
This theoretical tutorial explains exceptions, reasons for exceptions, different categories of exception and exception hierarchy.

791 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question