Solved

reference calling object

Posted on 2004-10-04
12
180 Views
Last Modified: 2010-03-31
Is there a (reasonable) way to reference the calling object without explicitly passing "this". Or in other words, does the called object know who called it?

Thanks!



0
Comment
Question by:adg
  • 4
  • 4
  • 2
  • +1
12 Comments
 
LVL 92

Expert Comment

by:objects
Comment Utility
no
0
 
LVL 3

Author Comment

by:adg
Comment Utility
Thats what I thought.
0
 
LVL 24

Expert Comment

by:sciuriware
Comment Utility
There should be a way digging in the assembly code.
But, what's the purpose?
;JOOP!
0
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:tomboshell
Comment Utility
Could throw and catch an exception and parse the trace, then use some reflection.
0
 
LVL 92

Expert Comment

by:objects
Comment Utility
> Could throw and catch an exception and parse the trace

that'd only get you the method, not the object.
0
 
LVL 24

Assisted Solution

by:sciuriware
sciuriware earned 20 total points
Comment Utility
Well, this way of working would reveal the classes.
But still not the object itself.
;JOOP!
0
Why You Should Analyze Threat Actor TTPs

After years of analyzing threat actor behavior, it’s become clear that at any given time there are specific tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) that are particularly prevalent. By analyzing and understanding these TTPs, you can dramatically enhance your security program.

 
LVL 7

Assisted Solution

by:tomboshell
tomboshell earned 30 total points
Comment Utility
If it is simply to identify what called it then that is good.  If it is desired to invoke methods on the caller then it of course would not work that well, except for final static methods and such.  Since the trace-to-reflection route would create a new object and not the calling object, but it would be an object of the same class/type.  
That would be a kinda crazy way and due to the reflection not the best for performance, so a call back object being passed to the class is the best for such purposes.  But it could be fun! And also provide lots of entertainment by debugging and maintaining.
0
 
LVL 92

Expert Comment

by:objects
Comment Utility
> but it would be an object of the same class/type.  

but very different state.
and how would you create it?
0
 
LVL 3

Author Comment

by:adg
Comment Utility
Wow, I hadn't realized all these nuances. In this case, I'm just interested in identifying the class of the caller. But I know that isn't exactly what I asked (because I didn't know any better).

>> But it could be fun! And also provide lots of entertainment by debugging and maintaining
Hah, just what I need!

I'm going to raise the points and split them. Thanks for all your help!
0
 
LVL 92

Accepted Solution

by:
objects earned 50 total points
Comment Utility
try this:

StackTraceElement[] trace = new Exception().getStackTrace();
String classname = trace[trace.length-2].getClassName();
0
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:tomboshell
Comment Utility
Thanks for the grade!

>> how would you create it?  
I would have to be a bit obtuse and say that it depends.  could do a classForName or use the class loader (hopefully it is the same) or use findClass(String name), could access a helper class (or a factory) with the string name, which I think would be preferrable.  It depends on where the class is and what constructors are available, if it is that person's class or a library, if it allows for construction outside of the package, what parameters if any, and prob other considerations that I did not mention.

>> but very different state.
I know, that is why it is not a very good way of reference, but it may be good just to get the name.  Otherwise, if it is just for knoweldge I would say to use a debugger and set a breakpoint at the part in the code that is of interest.
0
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:tomboshell
Comment Utility
0

Featured Post

Free Trending Threat Insights Every Day

Enhance your security with threat intelligence from the web. Get trending threat insights on hackers, exploits, and suspicious IP addresses delivered to your inbox with our free Cyber Daily.

Join & Write a Comment

By the end of 1980s, object oriented programming using languages like C++, Simula69 and ObjectPascal gained momentum. It looked like programmers finally found the perfect language. C++ successfully combined the object oriented principles of Simula w…
Basic understanding on "OO- Object Orientation" is needed for designing a logical solution to solve a problem. Basic OOAD is a prerequisite for a coder to ensure that they follow the basic design of OO. This would help developers to understand the b…
This tutorial covers a step-by-step guide to install VisualVM launcher in eclipse.
Viewers will learn how to properly install Eclipse with the necessary JDK, and will take a look at an introductory Java program. Download Eclipse installation zip file: Extract files from zip file: Download and install JDK 8: Open Eclipse and …

772 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

10 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now