Solved

Firewalls

Posted on 2004-10-07
2
229 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-16
I used the latest free Sygate firewall on my Win 2Kpro dial-up systems. Now though i have XP pro SP2 with its own invisible firewall...Still dial-up..pffff.
In your opinion which one is more effective?

With the Sygate one I could see what was occuring and had some control but with the XP one everything is invisable

Advice please

TIA
0
Comment
Question by:orbiter5
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
2 Comments
 

Assisted Solution

by:johnny_road
johnny_road earned 50 total points
ID: 12255457
Hi orbiter5,

Good choice on Sysgate.  If you felt comfortable with that s/w firewall (it's more advanced than some others), I suggest you install Sysgate on your box and then disable XP SP2's firewall.

The biggest issue is that quoting MS: "Windows Firewall will automatically allow all outbound connections, regardless of the program and the user context."  These means outbound access cannot be controlled with the built in firewall.  So, if you have a malicious program reaching out to the Internet, it would be allowed by default.

Here are some firewall related comparisons:
http://www.agnitum.com/php_scripts/compare2.php
http://www.pcflank.com/art41c.htm

Good luck,
JR
0
 
LVL 2

Accepted Solution

by:
kitisak earned 50 total points
ID: 12256030
It depends on users too. If you have firewall knowledge, you should use Sygate. Because it always alerts such as connecting internet,etc. So you can allow only important packet in or out your machine.

If you don't have firewall knowledge much, you should use XP Firewall. Because it 's easy to use and never alert anything. I think it is very friendly for users.
0

Featured Post

Get 15 Days FREE Full-Featured Trial

Benefit from a mission critical IT monitoring with Monitis Premium or get it FREE for your entry level monitoring needs.
-Over 200,000 users
-More than 300,000 websites monitored
-Used in 197 countries
-Recommended by 98% of users

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

There is a lot to be said for protecting yourself and your accounts with 2 factor authentication.  I found to my own chagrin, that there is a big downside as well.
Article by: Justin
In light of the WannaCry ransomware attack that affected millions of Windows machines, you might wonder if your Mac needs protecting. Yes, it does and here is how to do it.
Email security requires an ever evolving service that stays up to date with counter-evolving threats. The Email Laundry perform Research and Development to ensure their email security service evolves faster than cyber criminals. We apply our Threat…
Nobody understands Phishing better than an anti-spam company. That’s why we are providing Phishing Awareness Training to our customers. According to a report by Verizon, only 3% of targeted users report malicious emails to management. With compan…
Suggested Courses

615 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question