Solved

1Gb/s Fibre Channel throughput vs Gigabit Ethernet throughput

Posted on 2004-10-08
10
3,695 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-15
Given 1 Gb/s Fibre Channel HBA vs an Gigabit Ethernet connection,
What would be faster in terms of throughput?
Any url links would be appreciated.  
FYI we are using Emulex LP8000 HBA cards  
0
Comment
Question by:rawalker58
10 Comments
 
LVL 95

Expert Comment

by:Lee W, MVP
ID: 12260383
I would say the Fibre channel.  Because most network protocols have significant overhead that would lower the achieved data throughput.  Especially if your gig ethernet connection was copper and not fibre based.
0
 

Author Comment

by:rawalker58
ID: 12260949
Thank you for your reply. I believe this is correct as well. However I need data to back this up.
Do you know of any links or data to substantiate this?
0
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:411monk
ID: 12264017
If your talking FC versus iSCSI, absoloutely FC is faster on a 1GB pipe.  1GB fiber and 1GB copper is the same througput, copper being limited by distance.  The protocol you run on the physical cabling will be the determining factor.  iSCSI inputs variables such as TOE cards and offloading processing that places it second to FC.
0
New My Cloud Pro Series - organize everything!

With space to keep virtually everything, the My Cloud Pro Series offers your team the network storage to edit, save and share production files from anywhere with an internet connection. Compatible with both Mac and PC, you're able to protect your content regardless of OS.

 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:samccarthy
ID: 12268249
I would tend to agree with 411monk.  1gb Fiber and 1gb copper are the same in throughput, however the distance limitations are different.  When you are talking TCP/IP for example, once it gets down to the physical layer, it's the same anyway for fiber or copper.  So.......  Do you need the distance or to save some money.  If you want a cheap upgrade, Dell 24 port Gigabit switches run less than $400, so you can get a big bang for the buck with gigabit speed.

Steve
0
 
LVL 30

Accepted Solution

by:
Duncan Meyers earned 125 total points
ID: 12292802
FC real throughput is 100 MegaByte/sec (once you've taken out overheads etc) for the LP8000 (1Gb fibre attach). Gigabit ethernet is around 60-80 Megabytes per second. What is interesting though, is that an LP8000 on PCI bus connected to older storage will achieve 87MB/s write bandwidth and 85 MB/s read bandwidth. A QLogic QLA2340 (2Gb or 200MB/s card) achieves 130MB/s write and 190 MB/s read in a PCI bus. Put the same card in a PCI-X bus and that leaps to 194MB/s write and 190 MB/s read. You get similar figures for the Emulex LP9802.

What it all boils down to is that the limiting factor is the server itself.  It takes an enormous amount of CPU grunt to saturate the FC connection. In real world usage, you simply won't hit the bandwidth limitations of the FC interconnect. You'll hit CPU utilization, memory bandwidth or PCI bus limits first.

Having said all that I would always use FC in a SAN - even though it is more expensive than iSCSI or iFCP. You get a dedicated network for your storage that is designed for this application. And, as 411monk rightly points out, FC adapters do the protocol processing for you rather than offloading it to the CPU as in IP (some network cards excepted of course)
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:samccarthy
ID: 12492648
I would ask for a share.  As all were good answers, I would recommend a split among the 4.
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Duncan Meyers
ID: 12520359
No opinion...
0

Featured Post

Enterprise Mobility and BYOD For Dummies

Like “For Dummies” books, you can read this in whatever order you choose and learn about mobility and BYOD; and how to put a competitive mobile infrastructure in place. Developed for SMBs and large enterprises alike, you will find helpful use cases, planning, and implementation.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

AWS Glacier is Amazons cheapest storage option and is their answer to a ‘Cold’ storage service.  Customers primarily use this service for archival purposes and storage of infrastructure backups.  Its unlimited storage potential and low storage cost …
This article is an update and follow-up of my previous article:   Storage 101: common concepts in the IT enterprise storage This time, I expand on more frequently used storage concepts.
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of configuring basic necessities in order to use the 2010 version of Data Protection Manager. These include storage, agents, and protection jobs. Launch Data Protection Manager from the deskt…
This tutorial will show how to configure a new Backup Exec 2012 server and move an existing database to that server with the use of the BEUtility. Install Backup Exec 2012 on the new server and apply all of the latest hotfixes and service packs. The…

911 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

26 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now