Solved

1Gb/s Fibre Channel throughput vs Gigabit Ethernet throughput

Posted on 2004-10-08
10
3,793 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-15
Given 1 Gb/s Fibre Channel HBA vs an Gigabit Ethernet connection,
What would be faster in terms of throughput?
Any url links would be appreciated.  
FYI we are using Emulex LP8000 HBA cards  
0
Comment
Question by:rawalker58
10 Comments
 
LVL 95

Expert Comment

by:Lee W, MVP
ID: 12260383
I would say the Fibre channel.  Because most network protocols have significant overhead that would lower the achieved data throughput.  Especially if your gig ethernet connection was copper and not fibre based.
0
 

Author Comment

by:rawalker58
ID: 12260949
Thank you for your reply. I believe this is correct as well. However I need data to back this up.
Do you know of any links or data to substantiate this?
0
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:411monk
ID: 12264017
If your talking FC versus iSCSI, absoloutely FC is faster on a 1GB pipe.  1GB fiber and 1GB copper is the same througput, copper being limited by distance.  The protocol you run on the physical cabling will be the determining factor.  iSCSI inputs variables such as TOE cards and offloading processing that places it second to FC.
0
Best Practices: Disaster Recovery Testing

Besides backup, any IT division should have a disaster recovery plan. You will find a few tips below relating to the development of such a plan and to what issues one should pay special attention in the course of backup planning.

 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:samccarthy
ID: 12268249
I would tend to agree with 411monk.  1gb Fiber and 1gb copper are the same in throughput, however the distance limitations are different.  When you are talking TCP/IP for example, once it gets down to the physical layer, it's the same anyway for fiber or copper.  So.......  Do you need the distance or to save some money.  If you want a cheap upgrade, Dell 24 port Gigabit switches run less than $400, so you can get a big bang for the buck with gigabit speed.

Steve
0
 
LVL 30

Accepted Solution

by:
Duncan Meyers earned 125 total points
ID: 12292802
FC real throughput is 100 MegaByte/sec (once you've taken out overheads etc) for the LP8000 (1Gb fibre attach). Gigabit ethernet is around 60-80 Megabytes per second. What is interesting though, is that an LP8000 on PCI bus connected to older storage will achieve 87MB/s write bandwidth and 85 MB/s read bandwidth. A QLogic QLA2340 (2Gb or 200MB/s card) achieves 130MB/s write and 190 MB/s read in a PCI bus. Put the same card in a PCI-X bus and that leaps to 194MB/s write and 190 MB/s read. You get similar figures for the Emulex LP9802.

What it all boils down to is that the limiting factor is the server itself.  It takes an enormous amount of CPU grunt to saturate the FC connection. In real world usage, you simply won't hit the bandwidth limitations of the FC interconnect. You'll hit CPU utilization, memory bandwidth or PCI bus limits first.

Having said all that I would always use FC in a SAN - even though it is more expensive than iSCSI or iFCP. You get a dedicated network for your storage that is designed for this application. And, as 411monk rightly points out, FC adapters do the protocol processing for you rather than offloading it to the CPU as in IP (some network cards excepted of course)
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:samccarthy
ID: 12492648
I would ask for a share.  As all were good answers, I would recommend a split among the 4.
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Duncan Meyers
ID: 12520359
No opinion...
0

Featured Post

Migrating Your Company's PCs

To keep pace with competitors, businesses must keep employees productive, and that means providing them with the latest technology. This document provides the tips and tricks you need to help you migrate an outdated PC fleet to new desktops, laptops, and tablets.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Offsite hosted remote backup software for MSPs... 3 65
deduplication > shared folder size weirdness? 1 59
P2000 SAN SAS - RAID5 or RAID50 10 42
Google photos for iphone 6 52
Each year, investment in cloud platforms grows more than 20% (https://www.immun.io/hubfs/Immunio_2016/Content/Marketing/Cloud-Security-Report-2016.pdf?submissionGuid=a8d80a00-6fee-4b85-81db-a4e28f681762) as an increasing number of companies begin to…
Many businesses neglect disaster recovery and treat it as an after-thought. I can tell you first hand that data will be lost, hard drives die, servers will be hacked, and careless (or malicious) employees can ruin your data.
This tutorial will walk an individual through the steps necessary to install and configure the Windows Server Backup Utility. Directly connect an external storage device such as a USB drive, or CD\DVD burner: If the device is a USB drive, ensure i…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of installing the necessary services and then configuring a Windows Server 2012 system as an iSCSI target. To install the necessary roles, go to Server Manager, and select Add Roles and Featu…

830 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question