?
Solved

java 5.0 syntax

Posted on 2004-10-09
9
Medium Priority
?
213 Views
Last Modified: 2010-03-31
is there any way to do the following (this code doesnt even compile

private void addPreparedArgs(SQLStatement statement, List args, Class clazz)
  {
    for(Object value : args)
    {
      statement.addPreparedArgument(clazz.cast(value));
    }
  }

where:
 statement.addPreparedArgument(...);
can accept Date, float, int .. etc??

or still have to use series of if statements??
0
Comment
Question by:cathalmchale
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 5
  • 4
9 Comments
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:CEHJ
ID: 12266085
Just make the method take a type of Object:


statement.addPreparedArgument(value);
0
 

Author Comment

by:cathalmchale
ID: 12266106
its not my method, thats the problem!!  its on the back end and has been defined
0
 

Author Comment

by:cathalmchale
ID: 12266187
because u cannot even do the following - it says duplicate methods

private void addPreparedArgs(SQLStatement statement, List<Date> args)
  {
    for (Date value : args)
      statement.addPreparedArgument(value);
  }


  private void addPreparedArgs(SQLStatement statement, List<String> args)
  {
    for (String value : args)
      statement.addPreparedArgument(value);
  }

so guess there has to be some way of doing this!
0
Get 15 Days FREE Full-Featured Trial

Benefit from a mission critical IT monitoring with Monitis Premium or get it FREE for your entry level monitoring needs.
-Over 200,000 users
-More than 300,000 websites monitored
-Used in 197 countries
-Recommended by 98% of users

 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:CEHJ
ID: 12267125
>>its on the back end and has been defined

Well it's a question of how addPreparedArgument has been defined. How *has* is been defined?
0
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:CEHJ
ID: 12267279
If a parameter of type Object is used, then you can do something like this:

import java.util.List;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Date;


public class AddPrepared {

      public static void main(String[] args) {
            AddPrepared ap = new AddPrepared();
            SQLStatement ss = new SQLStatement();
            List list = new ArrayList();
            int i = 1;
            Date d = new Date();
            String s = "hello";
            list.add(i);
            list.add(d);
            list.add(s);
            ap.addPreparedArgs(ss, list, null);
      }


      private void addPreparedArgs(SQLStatement statement, List args, Class clazz) {
            for(Object value : args) {
                  statement.addPreparedArgument(value);
            }
      }


}

class SQLStatement {
      public void addPreparedArgument(Object value) {
            System.out.println(value);
      }
}
0
 

Author Comment

by:cathalmchale
ID: 12271544
the back-end has been defined as follows

class SQLStatement {
     public void addPreparedArgument(String value) {
       
     }
     public void addPreparedArgument(int value) {
       
     }
     public void addPreparedArgument(float value) {
       
     }
     public void addPreparedArgument(Date value) {
       
     }
}

in the front end i have

class SqlQuery (
    private SQLStatement sql;

    private List<Date> dateArgs;
    private List<String> filterArgs;

    //and i want to write a method which will add all the args in a list (regardless of the generic type of the list - as long as its type is 1 of those listed in the back-end) to the SQLStatement object.

  // see earlier posts for egs. of how i proposed to do this, but they dont work for obvious reasons, but is there a way to do this or should i just use if elses to figure out type.  I cant change the back end so i cannot pass Object to the sql.addPreparedArgument(Object o) as it has not been defined - the back end isnt to do any casting or validation, i must do this in the front end.

Thanks,
Cathal.
0
 
LVL 86

Accepted Solution

by:
CEHJ earned 200 total points
ID: 12271973
This is the way to do it, but if you can't change the back end, you'd  have to do something like:

            for(Object value : args) {
                  if (value instanceof Integer) {
                        statement.addPreparedArgument((Integer)value);
                  }
                  else if (value instanceof Float) {
                        statement.addPreparedArgument((Float)value);                  
                  }
                  //etc

            }





//SNIP===========================================
import java.util.List;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Date;


public class AddPrepared {

      public static void main(String[] args) {
            AddPrepared ap = new AddPrepared();
            SQLStatement ss = new SQLStatement();
            List list = new ArrayList();
            int i = 1;
            Date d = new Date();
            String s = "hello";
            list.add(i);
            list.add(d);
            list.add(s);
            ap.addPreparedArgs(ss, list, null);
      }


      private void addPreparedArgs(SQLStatement statement, List args, Class clazz) {
            for(Object value : args) {
                  statement.addPreparedArgument(value);
                  System.out.println(statement);
            }
      }


}

class SQLStatement {
      private Object argument;


      public void addPreparedArgument(Object value) {
            argument = value;
      }


      public String toString() {
            return "My argument is " + argument;
      }

}
0
 

Author Comment

by:cathalmchale
ID: 12274214
ok thanks a lot for your help.  1 further comment.  I notice in your answers you have:

 List list = new ArrayList();
          int i = 1;
          Date d = new Date();
          String s = "hello";
          list.add(i);
          list.add(d);
          list.add(s);

i.e. a single List to which you add different types of object. does it make any difference to a possible solution if you have like me, several lists of a single generic type?

 private List<Date> dateArgs;
    private List<String> filterArgs;

Kindest regards,
Cathal.
0
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:CEHJ
ID: 12274755
:-)

>>does it make any difference to a possible solution ...

I can't think of anything other than that you'd be able to treat your Lists uniformly, which may be convenient in certain cases

0

Featured Post

Optimize your web performance

What's in the eBook?
- Full list of reasons for poor performance
- Ultimate measures to speed things up
- Primary web monitoring types
- KPIs you should be monitoring in order to increase your ROI

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Introduction Java can be integrated with native programs using an interface called JNI(Java Native Interface). Native programs are programs which can directly run on the processor. JNI is simply a naming and calling convention so that the JVM (Java…
Java Flight Recorder and Java Mission Control together create a complete tool chain to continuously collect low level and detailed runtime information enabling after-the-fact incident analysis. Java Flight Recorder is a profiling and event collectio…
The viewer will learn how to implement Singleton Design Pattern in Java.
This video teaches viewers about errors in exception handling.
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month9 days, 17 hours left to enroll

762 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question