Solved

W3C validator does not like xthumbnail-orig-image

Posted on 2004-10-11
4
658 Views
Last Modified: 2008-02-01
Hi!

I am trying to validate a page with W3C.
It does not like the xthumbnail-orig-image command.

Is there a way to have a thumbnail of an image and still be W3C Complaint?

 <p align="center">
          <a href="images/VTSOutside.JPG">
          <img border="2" src="VTSOutside_small.JPG" align="middle" alt="" xthumbnail-orig-image="images/VTSOutside.JPG" width="100" height="60"></a></p>
       
0
Comment
Question by:TrueBlue
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
4 Comments
 
LVL 14

Assisted Solution

by:dfu23
dfu23 earned 50 total points
ID: 12280588
I think this is a FrontPage attibute ... remove it ... see what happens :)
0
 
LVL 31

Accepted Solution

by:
seanpowell earned 125 total points
ID: 12281547
Yes, it is FP, but removing it is not an option as it will regenerate every time you save the page.

The image will display in all browsers because of the additional standard source code, so validating in this case has nothing to do with acessibility.  If you're validating so your code is pure, than you have to stop using FP. If you're validating for another reason, than you have to decide between the ease of using FP, or coding by hand and being aware of what's going on behind the scenes.

Sean
0
 

Author Comment

by:TrueBlue
ID: 12282656
Hi Sean!

I believe I removed most of the FP from this page http://www.victoriastreasureshop.com

Is there any problem with doing the thumbnail the way I did it on this page?

Thank you in advance.
0
 
LVL 3

Assisted Solution

by:PaulPosition
PaulPosition earned 75 total points
ID: 12283838
(this comment should NOT be considered for pointsas it offers no solution (but a bit of poorman's wisdom) ..) :
W3C validator is way overrated. I mean, the way it is used is overrated.

Not many people care if your site is (or is not) valid (x)html. The inclusion of a 'W3C valid' image at the bottom is a nice thing for university projects and websites that talk of web devlopment (so they could pass the message around), but on a business, hobby or information site they don't really have their place.

What the validator is REALLY good at, though, is troubleshooting problem with your code. Inconsistencies and such are often easily spotted after a run through the validator. It will help you build better sites.

Now, when there's this little irritant that makes it so it *doesn't* validate anymore, of course you need to think a bit. Is there any other solution? Would it be more practical or less so? Is my current solution going to cause accessibility problems I don't want to see?  --  If there's no such problem, try commenting out the offending piece of code and send it back to validator. Is it valid? If yes, save yourself some frustration !
0

Featured Post

[Webinar] How Hackers Steal Your Credentials

Do You Know How Hackers Steal Your Credentials? Join us and Skyport Systems to learn how hackers steal your credentials and why Active Directory must be secure to stop them. Thursday, July 13, 2017 10:00 A.M. PDT

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

When applying CSS to your HTML, there are many different ways to select which element(s) the CSS applies to.  Some of these selectors are more commonly known and used than others - Here are the more common ones: #X - Matches an ID of X .X - Matche…
Building a website can seem like a daunting task to the uninitiated but it really only requires knowledge of two basic languages: HTML and CSS.
In this Micro Tutorial users will learn how to embed custom fonts into websites using @font-face in CSS Select a font: Ensure the EULA allows you to use @font-face: Download the font: Get the browser-compatible files you need: Edit your CSS       - Name …
Learn how to create flexible layouts using relative units in CSS.  New relative units added in CSS3 include vw(viewports width), vh(viewports height), vmin(minimum of viewports height and width), and vmax (maximum of viewports height and width).
Suggested Courses

623 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question