sasecool
asked on
Proper interface configuration cisco routing
I have a cisco router with 1 fast ethernet interface.
I then have that interface goto a switch, which connects to our bgp peer uplinks.
The question is as follows:
Do I 1. create sub interfaces on the cisco router, or 2. create secondary addresses to connect to the other subnets?
I'm pretty sure that you only want to use sub interfaces with vlan'ing, but I wanted to double check.
Thanks,
Paul
I then have that interface goto a switch, which connects to our bgp peer uplinks.
The question is as follows:
Do I 1. create sub interfaces on the cisco router, or 2. create secondary addresses to connect to the other subnets?
I'm pretty sure that you only want to use sub interfaces with vlan'ing, but I wanted to double check.
Thanks,
Paul
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
A trunk with subinterfaces sounds like the right solution to me. Each peer is on its own network range, right?
Any progress? Are you still working on this? Do you need more information?
ASKER
hrm...
to clarrify, no ip address has to be set on the interface to utilize the vlan features of the sub interfaces, correct?
Thanks,
Paul
... This solution works, but I would rather utilize the subinterfaces, however, the switch connected to the router does not support vlan trunking.
to clarrify, no ip address has to be set on the interface to utilize the vlan features of the sub interfaces, correct?
Thanks,
Paul
... This solution works, but I would rather utilize the subinterfaces, however, the switch connected to the router does not support vlan trunking.
Do you need more information?
Have you resolved this problem?
Can you close this question?
Thanks!
Have you resolved this problem?
Can you close this question?
Thanks!