Solved

Exchange 2003 backend mail store on global catalog server

Posted on 2004-10-20
6
156 Views
Last Modified: 2010-03-18
Is it neccesary to have exchange running on all the global catalog servers in order to use them as mail stores?

I am looking for a way to parcel out my mailboxes to servers near the users, however the hardware at the remote locations would be severely taxed by trying to run exchange not to mention the added costs would likely place me well out of budget. I do not want to have to use my vpn for all the clients to connect across the country using cached mode but this is my last resort option so any tips with that would be appreciated.
Oh and if anyone has a good idea of how to have a remote OSX user connect seamlessly to exchange2003 whether on or off the network. Microsoft says the rpc over ssl feature is only for outlook 2003 users. :(

Network: Pix's at each location with vpn between them. W2k3 SBS server running exchange and iis as the front end server running RPC proxy at corporate office. Win2k AD controllers at 4 remote locations running as GC's. Mixed 2000/xp clients. laptops all XP desktops will be moved over in time.
0
Comment
Question by:ajcal225
  • 3
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 70

Assisted Solution

by:Chris Dent
Chris Dent earned 200 total points
ID: 12361393


You would need multiple Exchange Servers installed to distribute / spread out the Information Stores (Mailbox Stores).

The Global Catalog part isn't really a restriction for this, Exchange doesn't need to run on a Global Catalog at all.

Afraid I can't help with the last bit, as you say... Outlook 2003.
0
 

Author Comment

by:ajcal225
ID: 12361888
Ok so maybe I would be better off asking how to point certian clients to look fo rhteir remote mail store in a specific location and then using dfs and multiple mail sotres based on users group enrollment move the mail for those users local to them.

Im currently using the microsoft document: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/techinfo/overview/advmail.mspx to work on doing this.

Im open to better ideas...
0
 
LVL 70

Expert Comment

by:Chris Dent
ID: 12362005

You won't be able to do that with Exchange (the document describes the Internet Mail Service that is part of IIS), if you're happy with that then I'm sure it can be set up.
0
IT, Stop Being Called Into Every Meeting

Highfive is so simple that setting up every meeting room takes just minutes and every employee will be able to start or join a call from any room with ease. Never be called into a meeting just to get it started again. This is how video conferencing should work!

 

Author Comment

by:ajcal225
ID: 12362951
Well I would be able to do what i want having the mail store located on the remote computer and replicated via dfs if I werent running the standard version of exchange 2003 which is limited to a single mail store.
I am gonna have to give up at this point unless someone comes up with something crazy.
Ill check back in a few days.
0
 
LVL 21

Accepted Solution

by:
marc_nivens earned 100 total points
ID: 12367756
Well I would be able to do what i want having the mail store located on the remote computer and replicated via dfs if I werent running the standard version of exchange 2003 which is limited to a single mail store.

This is not true.  This will not work and is completely unsupported.  You either need to have clients go accross the WAN, or install an Exchange server at the remote location.  Even if you could put the DB on a local machine, the client still gets its data through the Exchange server so it wouldn't save bandwidth anyway.
0
 
LVL 70

Assisted Solution

by:Chris Dent
Chris Dent earned 200 total points
ID: 12367930

Yep, Marc is correct.

The only configurations Exchange supports for it's databases are Local or Storage Area Network (iSCSI or Fibre Channel I believe). There was talk of Network Attached Storage support, but it's not there yet and no sign of when / if it will be.

You'll find that the Storage Device used will be a dependancy for the System Attendant, it wouldn't be happy working without dedicated storage.

Anyway, not only would that configuration not save bandwidth, but it would increase bandwidth usage because Exchange would have to first collect data from the Information Store, then pull it to itself, then send it back down to the client again.

The only way you can really distribute Exchange is with multiple E-mail Servers.

The same applies for any mail server really, just some are cheaper than others when it comes to wanting lots of them.
0

Featured Post

How to run any project with ease

Manage projects of all sizes how you want. Great for personal to-do lists, project milestones, team priorities and launch plans.
- Combine task lists, docs, spreadsheets, and chat in one
- View and edit from mobile/offline
- Cut down on emails

Join & Write a Comment

FIPS stands for the Federal Information Processing Standardisation and FIPS 140-2 is a collection of standards that are generically associated with hardware and software cryptography. In most cases, people can refer to this as the method of encrypti…
Downtime reduced, data recovered by utilizing an Experts Exchange Business Account Challenge The United States Marine Corps employs more than 200,000 active-duty Marines with operations in four continents, all requiring complex networking system…
This video gives you a great overview about bandwidth monitoring with SNMP and WMI with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg). If you're looking for how to monitor bandwidth using netflow or packet s…
This video explains how to create simple products associated to Magento configurable product and offers fast way of their generation with Store Manager for Magento tool.

743 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

12 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now