rex68
asked on
Routing between Cisco 1721 and 2620
Dear All,
Let's assume that a company has 2 network segments, 192.168.1.0 & 192.168.50.0.. Initially, they had the 1721 for the routing, 192.168.50.0 to int fa0 (100BaseT) and 192.168.1.0 to eth0 (modular, 10BaseT). Now, users from the 192.168.1.0 segment are complaining that their access is crawling and there seems to be a bottleneck between the peak hours of 10am-12am & 2pm-4pm.
This company has an extra 2620 and my question now is assuming that I have 192.168.1.0 network on 1721 and 192.168.50.0 on the 2620 and connecting both routers through serial cable, how should I configure both routers? an example config would certainly help..
thanks and regards,
rex.
Let's assume that a company has 2 network segments, 192.168.1.0 & 192.168.50.0.. Initially, they had the 1721 for the routing, 192.168.50.0 to int fa0 (100BaseT) and 192.168.1.0 to eth0 (modular, 10BaseT). Now, users from the 192.168.1.0 segment are complaining that their access is crawling and there seems to be a bottleneck between the peak hours of 10am-12am & 2pm-4pm.
This company has an extra 2620 and my question now is assuming that I have 192.168.1.0 network on 1721 and 192.168.50.0 on the 2620 and connecting both routers through serial cable, how should I configure both routers? an example config would certainly help..
thanks and regards,
rex.
ASKER
hey j3ggs..
yea you got that right.. and thank you for your quick response.
well, i did actually found a 100BaseT module for 1721, WIC-4ESW however it requires IOS ver 12.3XC while I have 12.3XA on my 1721. So, I thought I'd come up with another temp solution for now until the vendor gets back to me on that.
hmm, would you probably have a better suggestion before I close this?
cheers =)
REX
yea you got that right.. and thank you for your quick response.
well, i did actually found a 100BaseT module for 1721, WIC-4ESW however it requires IOS ver 12.3XC while I have 12.3XA on my 1721. So, I thought I'd come up with another temp solution for now until the vendor gets back to me on that.
hmm, would you probably have a better suggestion before I close this?
cheers =)
REX
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
hey j3ggs,
yea i've checked the duplex settings and they seemed allright..
thanks for the fast switching and CEF tip,i'll try that out..
here's an extra 50 for your great assistance..
cheers,
REX
yea i've checked the duplex settings and they seemed allright..
thanks for the fast switching and CEF tip,i'll try that out..
here's an extra 50 for your great assistance..
cheers,
REX
Assuming that the connection between serial interfaces is a back to back serial cable (and the DCE end is the 2600), the configs would be similar too:
Cisco 1721:
interface fas0
description Connection to 192.168.1.0 network
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
no shut
interface serial 0
description Connection to 2620 router
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
encapsulation hdlc
bandwidth 2048
no shut
ip route 192.168.50.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.2
Cisco 2620:
interface fas0/0
description Connection to 192.168.50.0 network
ip address 192.168.50.1 255.255.255.0
no shut
interface serial 0/0
description Connection to 1721 router
ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.252
encapsulation hdlc
bandwidth 2048
clock rate 2000000
no shut
ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.2
regards
j3ggs
PS Is this actually what you want to do though... Are you doing this to relieve the bottleneck?