Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
?
Solved

Terminal Server Licencing and Aquisition

Posted on 2005-03-29
1
Medium Priority
?
216 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-18
Hi Everyone,

I've done a fair bit of research and have a decent understanding of the Terminal Server 2003 licencing however am not 100% sure of what is happening in our situation

We have win 2003 Term Server up and running and almost let the 'Grace Period' Expire without the purchase / implementation of the Licencing server.

At this stage we had set up around 14 accounts.

9 accounts created on day 1 of grace period
5 accounts created on day 118 of grace period

We then implemented the Licencing Server and purchased 20 Per User Cals and switched to Per User Mode.

Another 9 accounts were created

Total accounts = 23       Total licences = 20

We are able to connect with all 23 users to the server...?

Is this because the 5 accounts that we created on day 118 of the grace period were issued a 120 day temp licence?  and as its been 82 (30-03-05) days since the instalation of the Licencing Server they are still using this temp licence?

The 9 accounts created on day 1 of the grace period would have expired, but does the temp licence have to 'run out' before communication to the licencing server occurs to aquire a 'Proper CAL'...meaning these 5 accounts created on day 118 of the grace period will expire in 38 days?

0
Comment
Question by:CharterMerc
1 Comment
 
LVL 86

Accepted Solution

by:
oBdA earned 1600 total points
ID: 13660032
That's because Per User TS CALs aren't managed (yet), so you won't notice a decrease in the available licenses. To comply with the EULA, you'll still have to add the missing licenses.

The function of Terminal Server CALs in Windows Server 2003
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=822134

"Currently, Window Server 2003 does not manage User CALs. This means that even though there is a User CAL in the license server database, the User CAL will not be decremented when it is used. This does not remove administrators from End User License Agreement (EULA) requirements to have a valid terminal server (TS) CAL for each user. Failure to have a User CAL for each user, if Device CALs are not being used, is a violation of the EULA. In the future, this behavior will be changed and User CALs will be managed. "
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Path Explorer

An intuitive utility to help find the CSS path to UI elements on a webpage. These paths are used frequently in a variety of front-end development and QA automation tasks.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This may not be a text book method to resolve VSS backup issues but it seemed to have worked on few of the Windows 2003 servers we had issues while performing a Volume Shadow Copy backup. If you have issues while performing a shadow copy backup usin…
A quick step-by-step overview of installing and configuring Carbonite Server Backup.
When cloud platforms entered the scene, users and companies jumped on board to take advantage of the many benefits, like the ability to work and connect with company information from various locations. What many didn't foresee was the increased risk…
As many of you are aware about Scanpst.exe utility which is owned by Microsoft itself to repair inaccessible or damaged PST files, but the question is do you really think Scanpst.exe is capable to repair all sorts of PST related corruption issues?

578 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question