I'm an IT pro. I spend too much time reinstalling my Windows 2000 Pro on my own laptop after a program hoses the installation, or in my current case:
Microsoft itself implodes and necessitates me to reload windows from scratch.
Forgetting all the server vs. pro and the need for different programs such as a server anti-virus program does anyone feel that 2000 Advanced Server would be less susceptible to needing to be reloaded all the time. In other words, does anyone think that Windows 2000 Server would fare better in the long run because it is built heartier?
I know I'm not phrasing it the way I would like, but since I'm at the point where I have to reinstall again, why not install server instead of pro? I can always turn off the services I don't need.