<div>
Would that access list entry also be necessary on my firewall? I currently have the following for the access list for the terminal services server:<br />
<br />
access-list 101 permit tcp any gt 1023 host server.ip eq www<br />
access-list 101 permit tcp any gt 1023 host server.ip eq 3389<br />
<br />
<br />
If I add the gre packet entry to my firewall do I still need it for classing the data?
</div>


Would that access list entry also be necessary on my firewall? I currently have the following for the access list for the terminal services server:

access-list 101 permit tcp any gt 1023 host server.ip eq www
access-list 101 permit tcp any gt 1023 host server.ip eq 3389


If I add the gre packet entry to my firewall do I still need it for classing the data?

<div>
Hi,<br />
<br />
yes it will need to be added to any device that filters packets routed to the vpn server.<br />
<br />
cheers.<br />

</div>


Hi,

yes it will need to be added to any device that filters packets routed to the vpn server.

cheers.


<div>
For my PIX firewall should the entry be:<br />
<br />
access-list 101 permit gre any host server.ip
</div>


For my PIX firewall should the entry be:

access-list 101 permit gre any host server.ip

<div>
yes, something like that. &nbsp;I can't remember if cisco IOS recognises 'gre' as a protocol id. &nbsp;if not, then use <br />
<br />
access-list 101 permit 47 any host server.ip<br />
<br />
cheers.<br />

</div>


yes, something like that.  I can't remember if cisco IOS recognises 'gre' as a protocol id.  if not, then use

access-list 101 permit 47 any host server.ip

cheers.


<div>
<div class="content wysiwyg-content">
I am setting up class of service on my Cisco 2600 in order to dedicate bandwidth for my remote users coming in via terminal services. I have created an access list using tcp port 3389 to identify their traffic based on another posting I saw here. access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 3389. Will that correctly identify my remote users traffic and class it accordingly?
</div>
</div>


I am setting up class of service on my Cisco 2600 in order to dedicate bandwidth for my remote users coming in via terminal services. I have created an access list using tcp port 3389 to identify their traffic based on another posting I saw here. access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 3389. Will that correctly identify my remote users traffic and class it accordingly?

QOS for terminal services on a cisco router

The Windows operating systems have distinct methodologies for designing and implementing networks, and have specific systems to accomplish various networking processes, such as Exchange for email, Sharepoint for shared files and programs, and IIS for delivery of web pages. Microsoft also produces server technologies for networked database use, security and virtualization.