new domain or additional DC

With Novell's move to Linux, our site will probably move to MS Active directory.  We are a small school district with two buildings connected by 100m of fiber.  We are considering two directory structures. 1. Single domain, two DCs one at the elementary and one in the secondary.  2.  Two domains, one in elementary and one at secondary.  What are the advantages/disadvantages of these two? As I understand it, plan 1 provides redundency if one server goes down, but creates more WAN traffic for replication. Plan 2 has less WAN traffic, but if one server goes down, that domain is down. Looking for recommendations.
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

i would go with design 1

i think its more important to look at redundancy here and also adminsitration, one AD which means one nice single point of administration

your setup doesnt call for two domains at all, WAN traffice isnt an issue, as you can control your replication times, and AD traffic isnt exactly huge!

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
if you need different security sets for different sides of the school, you can use a detailed AD structure to apply different policies and priviliges inter-site
As for replication.  Windows Server 2003 (unlike Windows 2000 server) only replicates changed items, not everything, so after initial set-up, replication traffic will likely be nominal and way below what I guess your fiber can handle.  Like Jay Jay70 says, you get better redundancy.

hage1Author Commented:
I agree completely.  I just wanted some reenforcement from somebody out there.  I feel like a traitor moving from Novell to MS, but we've got test servers setup for both and MS seems much more robust.  Thanks
ah its not being a traitor, its simply coming to the light my friend!
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Windows Networking

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.