# Partial fractions—The 'cover-up method'

For anyone who needs a quick bit of revising, see:
http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/kenny/papers/partial.html#cover
for an example of the cover-up method.

Now, I've remembered pretty much everything I need to do, and for all fractions with distinct linear factors, I can use this technique to solve a partial fractions problem.

However, I don't understand how it actually works ...

For example, one of the steps requires that for each factor, you set x to a value that cancels one of the factors out. But by doing this, it sets that factor to be equal to 0 ... which surely should result in the entire denominator being 0 .......

How can this be?

LVL 25
###### Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Commented:
Consider it the limit as the denominator of the factor approaches 0.
the term approaches infinity and becomes the domimant term so you can ignore the others
the ratio of the term to the entire fraction is then approaches the factor for that term
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Author Commented:
I guess that's an easy way of thinking of it :)

Cheers.
0
Author Commented:
http:/Q_21785010.html