Cluster size 512 bytes vs 4 kb

I understand the advantage of a smaller sector size when formatting a hard drive.  A small file such as a 1 kb shortcut will use a complete sector.  Therefore it wastes less space on a 512 b sector as opposed to a 4 or 8 kb sector.  So are there any advantages to a 4 kb sector as is the default for NT?  
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Lee W, MVPTechnology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
Sure... If your going to store LOTS of large files, it's better to use a larger cluster size - less fragmentation and larger blocks of reads.

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by ConnectWise

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
mrlagasseAuthor Commented:
Does larger blocks of reads equate to faster performance?
mrlagasseAuthor Commented:
Ok, I found the answer at PCGUIDE.  I asked because I noticed when I converted a fat partion to NTFS, it automatically chose 512.  Now I see that may be a speed problem.  Thank you.
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.