rbradberry
asked on
DHCP Redundancy and Reservations
Okay I have 2 Windows 2003 DHCP Servers. I have reservations set up for .2, .3, .4, and .5 IP Addresses. If I set up the reservations in both DHCP Servers I get an IP Policy conflict. If I set up the servers to give out different IP address ranges the reserved clients will receive the IP from the DHCP server without the reservations. The same goes if I set up reservations on one server and not on the other.
What I end up doing is diabling the DHCP server without the reservation then rebooting the client the starting the DHCP server again.
I would like to have the fault tolerance for both DHCP servers with my reservations and without having to start and stop the DHCP service.
Thank you for your help
-Russ
What I end up doing is diabling the DHCP server without the reservation then rebooting the client the starting the DHCP server again.
I would like to have the fault tolerance for both DHCP servers with my reservations and without having to start and stop the DHCP service.
Thank you for your help
-Russ
ASKER
but if i set a reservations on one server 1 and exclusions on server 2 then server 2 will just give the client a non excluded ip address but wont give it the reserved one.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
I think you can do what i just mentioned with super scopes....
Andy
Andy
ASKER
so basically I set up my superscopes to be:
so if I set up server 1 with the first 80% and server 2 with the remaining 20%, and the reservation is given on server 1. Can I set that reservation on server 2 so that server 2 doesn't give it one of it's available IP addresses?
so if I set up server 1 with the first 80% and server 2 with the remaining 20%, and the reservation is given on server 1. Can I set that reservation on server 2 so that server 2 doesn't give it one of it's available IP addresses?
http://www.tek-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=4927
nprignano