We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

We've partnered with Certified Experts, Carl Webster and Richard Faulkner, to bring you a podcast all about Citrix Workspace, moving to the cloud, and analytics & intelligence. Episode 2 coming soon!Listen Now


Implementing a timer thread

sapbucket asked
Medium Priority
Last Modified: 2011-10-03

 I'm a newb when it comes to threading. I have a very specific thing I would like to try out.

 I want to download html from a list of url's I have. There are approximately 300 url's. I can usually get through about 40-50 url's before the downloader I am using hangs up. I want to use a timer thread to call a method after 10 seconds (I define a "hangup" as any download that is taking longer than 10 seconds: the average url takes about 1 sec to download, so this is reasonable). The timer is reset after each successful download. If a "hangup" occurs I want to stop the current thread (the one that is hung up) and start a new thread using the same url.

So something like this:

1.) start process (main)
2.) load url list from file.
3.) loop through each url, processing each one in the following manner:
  a.) start thread timer.
  b.) start download of url.  <---(**note 1**)
  c.) if download successful, stop timer and repeat loop using next url.
  d.) if thread timer expires (download is unsuccesful), stop timer and repeat loop using same url. increment 'downloadAttempts' by 1.
    e.) if 'downloadAttempts' > 6, stop timer and repeat loop using next url.

  However, when i implement the above timer thread algorithm I get all kinds of unexpected errors. I believe they stem from the fact that when the "hang up" occurs (and I start a new thread using the timer) the OLD thread (the one that is "hung up") has not been disposed of and is using resources I need.

So a couple questions:
1.) is the general layout of my timer thread algorithm ok? Am I approaching this problem correctly?
2.) how to dispose of the thread that is hung up? can I save the id of a thread, and if it gets hung up, dispose of it from a new thread (using the timer thread for example)? (see **note 1**)

**note 1**
// it seems like at this point instead of using the main process thread I could launch a new one:
b.) start download of url in its own thread:
  1.) start thread (save id of it) and use it to perform download
  2.) if timer thread expires ("hang up" occurs) delete thread (we saved the id, so this seems possible)
  3.) repeat loop using same url

Many thanks for your expert advice!

Watch Question

1) It looks correct to me
2) If it don't hang all your pc..yes
High School Computer Science, Computer Applications, Digital Design, and Mathematics Teacher
Top Expert 2009
You don't need to store the "ID" of the Thread...just store a reference to the Thread itself.  Then call the Abort() method on it from the Timer event.

Or you can encapsulate the threaded web request in a class that receives the URL as a parameter.  The class should raise an event when it completes its processing.  You can set a flag in the class if it should NOT raise the event anymore because it has "timed out".  This has the advantage that the thread can be properly cleaned up since we didn't Abort() it.

Not the solution you were looking for? Getting a personalized solution is easy.

Ask the Experts


Thanks Idle_Mind!

I had to invert my thinking a bit: I was putting the timer thread in the calling class, and not in the encaspulated class.

So when the timer goes off, I simply dispose of the encapsulated class.

Also, I WAS using a singleton for my downloader. Its a little slower, but now I instance a downloader for each url. These get cleaned up by the timer thread (after 8 seconds). I also added an event class to synchronize some properties that I need for each download (imagine that the downloads are firing asynchronously - I need to have the filename passed in with the event args - otherwise i don't know which download I am responsing too).

Result: download is a little slower (by a second or two per url) but I don't get any hangups. I get a 99/100 success rate. The 1 that slips by saves to files with 0 kb size. So, to make it 100%, when the process is done, I search the directory for any files that are > 1kb and download them again.

Thanks again!
Access more of Experts Exchange with a free account
Thanks for using Experts Exchange.

Create a free account to continue.

Limited access with a free account allows you to:

  • View three pieces of content (articles, solutions, posts, and videos)
  • Ask the experts questions (counted toward content limit)
  • Customize your dashboard and profile

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.


Please enter a first name

Please enter a last name

8+ characters (letters, numbers, and a symbol)

By clicking, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.