We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

We've partnered with Certified Experts, Carl Webster and Richard Faulkner, to bring you a podcast all about Citrix Workspace, moving to the cloud, and analytics & intelligence. Episode 2 coming soon!Listen Now

x

Small Business Network suggestions, Please

westone
westone asked
on
Medium Priority
235 Views
Last Modified: 2010-05-18
Hey,
I have 8 years experience administering networks for small businesses up to a dozen or so workstations and a single server. A potential client called to discuss setting up a new business, a realty office, with up to 50 realtors with workstations.

They need 2 things: Internet (easy enough) and storage for large amounts of high resolution pictures. The workstations need access to the data (pictures) locally, and everything else is done online, so no business application or such. They will need remote access to the data, as well.

They need reliable storage for lots of data, indicating a server with SCSI drives and a RAID setup. Great, I love that. I quickly realized that 50 client licenses for a Network OS to get access to data will add greatly to the cost of the system. And it is looking like a need for storage more than a need for giving and restricting access, such as I am used to. I'm thinking maybe my experience may not be the best or most efficient solution for this situation.

So my question is this: What would you do to provide 50 workstations with reliable access to a large amount of data. A Windows Server with the necessary licenses or is there a better solution?
 
All applicable experience appreciated!

Thanks,
Bill
Comment
Watch Question

CERTIFIED EXPERT
Commented:
I would go with the Windows server and the necessary licenses and a big storage subsystem.  Depending on how many users need remote access, you could either go with a terminal server or a have them remote into their desktops through a vpn connection.  There are a lot of different options really for the remote access, but those are probably the most common.  

Cole

Not the solution you were looking for? Getting a personalized solution is easy.

Ask the Experts
Commented:
Hi

We seem to be talking about a file server with high availability, but as low a cost as possible. Why not consider Linux for this server ? No CALs needed, quite easy to maintain, reliable, efficient, flexible (more than Windows as a pure fileserver). It would be transparent for your users, and costs would be optimized.

HTH
Cheers

Commented:
In addition, you may want to check this link :

http://www.real-time.com/linuxsolutions/fileserver.html

As regards to availability, you definitely want to implement a RAID solution, preferrably with hot plug drives if you can afford them.

HTH
Cheers

Author

Commented:
Thanks to both of you.

Am already considering Linux, for just data storage. From what I've looked at so far, for 50 users, the cost of the NOS could be as little as 10% of the cost of Windows server 2003 Standard w/ 50 user licenses.
Access more of Experts Exchange with a free account
Thanks for using Experts Exchange.

Create a free account to continue.

Limited access with a free account allows you to:

  • View three pieces of content (articles, solutions, posts, and videos)
  • Ask the experts questions (counted toward content limit)
  • Customize your dashboard and profile

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

OR

Please enter a first name

Please enter a last name

8+ characters (letters, numbers, and a symbol)

By clicking, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.