IDE / SATA RAID - Which is faster / better onboard or PCI expansion card?

I am working on building a couple of machines that will use a IDE RAID or SATA RAID controller.  I have two PCI ATA IDE RAID  cards a 3Ware Escalade 4LP and a Rocket RAID 404 card.  Also avaiable to me is a ABIT NF7-S v2 motherboard with a(n) onboard SATA RAID controller

I am looking for the following;

+ speed
+ notifications (heat, failure, ect)
+ anything that I may not have considered already.

I plan to use the machines as a workstation by day, and as a backup solution at night after the employees have gone home.

Will I be better served by using the expansion card, or by going with the controller that is in place on the system, and why?
Please advise.
lchambersAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

CallandorCommented:
I strongly suspect the 3Ware Escalade 4LP and the Abit NF7-S motherboard will give you the fastest solutions, as the 3Ware cards are high performance cards.  If you go with the motherboard solution, you will likely be limited to RAID-0 and RAID-1, because motherboard RAID doesn't have the expensive hardware to compute parity for RAID-5.  All in all, the 3Ware cards are more expensive, but will provide the most features.  There was a discussion on this in a previous question: http://www.experts-exchange.com/Hardware/Q_21790692.html 
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
PCBONEZCommented:
It might not matter because the controller's speed isn't the real limitation.

Regardless of the drive being SATA, PATA, or SCSI......
The bottle neck to moving data on and off hard drives is more of a mechanical issue and isn't the controller at all.
It's the transfer rate between the actual disk and heads.
The controller interface used has nothing to do with it.

Vendors of hard drives want to sell you on the capabilities of their controller interface and completely disregard the fact that the drive can't get data on and off the heads that fast anyway.
In fact. Most hard drive venders have dropped the head-disk transfer rates out of their specification tables so buyers can't figure this out.

The best sustained head-disk transfer rate I've seen were in the range of 58 to 59 MB/sec.
(I looked at SATA, PATA, and SCSI 7200 RPM drives around 18 months ago before these specs went *POOF* from the tables. Like anything else, as time passes this will improve with newer technology but right now the manufacturers are hiding the numbers.)

The advantage of a faster controller is being able to move data from more than one drive at the same time.
.
Just something to keep in mind when you are figuring out how fast you can more your data through a given setup.
.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Desktops

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.