We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

We've partnered with Certified Experts, Carl Webster and Richard Faulkner, to bring you a podcast all about Citrix Workspace, moving to the cloud, and analytics & intelligence. Episode 2 coming soon!Listen Now

x

2 NIC / 1 Windows Terminal Server

fcqmax
fcqmax asked
on
Medium Priority
308 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-05
Lets say I have 2 x NIC with different IP Addresses, lets call them NIC1 and NIC2. Both are connected to the Internet with different IP Addresses and the machine has Windows 2003 Terminal Server installed. Is it possible to implement the following scenario?

I ask users to always connect through the primary NIC 2 address UNLESS they get a notification saying that the current session limit is over 30. Then they are required to connect through the NIC1 address.

By doing so I allocate sufficient bandwidth for best responsive use through NIC1 by setting the limit to 30 sessions. If it reaches the limit then they can connect to secondary NIC1 address where the bandwidth is less busy.

Is this possible?
Comment
Watch Question

do you have two Public IP addresses?  


probably better off using NIC Teaming..where you team the two NICs into one virtual NIC.  The bandwidth is doubled by default in Adaptive Load Balancing mode...  or if you have Cisco Fast Etherchannel, you can quad. your bandwidth.    

Not the solution you were looking for? Getting a personalized solution is easy.

Ask the Experts

Author

Commented:
Yes, I'm thinking of subscribing 2 ADSL lines and then linking them up to one 2003 server using 2 NICs.

where you team the two NICs into one virtual NIC..  Is this a feature in Windows 2003 Server?
Yes...built in...although, if this is a DELL or HP, IBM etc, there are specific procedures for each brand.  What do you have?  What server model?  

This also can be controlled through your NIC drivers...

Author

Commented:
Actually, I'm thinking about building my own box. This system doesn't exist yet. So Windows 2000 can also do this NIC teaming? Or does it solely depend on the NIC manufacturer/driver? Which NIC is best for this type of teaming?

Author

Commented:
nevermind, i checked your examples, Win2K also works. So it depends on the NIC/driver. Thanks.
Basically all newer nics support this..

Best is CISCO FAST ETHERCHANNEL teaming...  (Switch must support Cisco Fast Etherchannel technology)
Second Best is Adaptive Load Balancing  (No switch dependancy)
Third, is fail on fault...  (Not good for your situation)

http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/NETWORK/9195P/en/Intel_nic_teaming_10.pdf

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/techno/media/lan/ether/channel/tech/fetec_wp.htm



Access more of Experts Exchange with a free account
Thanks for using Experts Exchange.

Create a free account to continue.

Limited access with a free account allows you to:

  • View three pieces of content (articles, solutions, posts, and videos)
  • Ask the experts questions (counted toward content limit)
  • Customize your dashboard and profile

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

OR

Please enter a first name

Please enter a last name

8+ characters (letters, numbers, and a symbol)

By clicking, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.