What kind of Hub to use with Surfcontrol

Monitoring Internet usage on my network with SurfControl (great product, by the way, for anyone who's looking for granular web monitoring capabiltiy).

Per SurfControl, in order to get it to correctly monitor your network, you have to plug the SurfControl server into the same hub as your firewall and the rest of your LAN.

Had to call them to get this straight cause I originally had it plugged into a 3Com switch and it was only monitoring the traffic on the server itself, not the rest of the LAN;  evidently, due to the fact that it must be either plugged into a switch with port-spanning or a plain old hub (so I would take it that the 3Com wasn't spanning).

Which brings me to my question, I did have a rattly old BayNetworks 10Mb hub laying around that I'm using.  That got the SurfControl to monitor the entire network but I'm concerned about a bottleneck with this hub.

So far, no user complaints, but I'm wondering if I should upgrade, and to what; a 100 hub?

Thoughts and opinions would be much appreciated.
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

If you have to go with a hub you will want to go with a 100MB one and you will want to plug only the firewall and the server into this hub then link it to the 3com. Reason being whatever you plug into a hub is in the same collision domain. If your 3com switch is managable you can use port spanning to have all traffic on the switch pass through this port for monitoring purposes. You can do this for the port the server and the port the firewall are plugged into and it will work just fine. This is what we are doing now with Websense.

Best of luck,

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
sounds like you answered your own question. if your not at gigabit - the 10/100 is a good idea. any hub/switch that doesnt have 'smart' programming, or if it does- must have port spanning. as far as bottleneck. you really have to know your bandwidth on your network to determine if it will help..( the 10mb hub could be considered fine on some networks)... that part depends....

mbath20110Author Commented:
Thanks Mitch (I'm a Mitch too).

Both yours Craig's responses were helpful but since you checked in first, I'll award you the points.

Have no experience with Port Spanning.  Is it worth trying to implement or should I just get 100Mb Hub?
haha cool you are the third mitch ive ever come across! If your switch is managable ( you can access and configure it via console/telnet/http) it is worth it. If not a 100MB hub will work just fine.

Best regards!
mbath20110Author Commented:
Thanks Mitch.
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Windows Networking

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.