Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium


SATA RAID throughput question

Posted on 2006-04-10
Medium Priority
Last Modified: 2008-01-09
A question to the SATA RAID Experts:

We measured the throughput for an INTEL SCRS28X SATA RAID controller with a few SATA II drives and determined, that we realize a data throughput (all cache modes disabled -> write through) from about 0.2 upt ro 0.8 MBit/s. The same drives connected to the onboad RAID controller results up to max 3 MB/s (also cache disabled). This happens also in modes without any RAID. Which cache mode enabled, the drives have a expected throughput from about 60 MBit/s on both controllers.

Does somebody have an explanation for me, why the throughput is such poor if caching is disabled?

We measured with benchmarking tools, but also if you just copy a file around, you "feel" the poor performance.
Question by:Bembi

Assisted Solution

The_IT_Garage earned 400 total points
ID: 16417538
Read the "Disk Cache" portion of this page: http://tinyurl.com/lamof

It explains what you're seeing as well as being a good information of what caching of all types is.
LVL 34

Expert Comment

ID: 16418464
I cant find any info on an intel scrs28x, but if its a standard 32-bit pci card that would explain the slow throughput (133MB/s) its being bottlenecked by the slower pci bus (sata II hdds have a max theoretical throuput of 300MB/s), the onboard controller isnt going to be bottlenecked like the pci card so you will get faster performance. The fix for this would be to get a pci express raid controller (4X pci-e 1000MB/s) or a PCI-X (532 MB/s) controller.
LVL 11

Accepted Solution

Renato Montenegro Rustici earned 1600 total points
ID: 16418619
Please, mount only one disk and test it with HDTach (freeware):


Run the long test. You should achieve something beyond 48 MBytes/s on average read. Maybe more, maybe less.

After that, build the RAID. and try again. You wont double the drive's transfer rate but must get almost twice as fast - 80 to 95 MBytes/s - in a RAID 0 (for example) setup.

Lower speeds or results that vary in each pass of the tests, may be due to a defunct hard drive or controller. In this case, test each item at a time.

Modern healthcare requires a modern cloud. View this brief video to understand how the Concerto Cloud for Healthcare can help your organization.

LVL 11

Expert Comment

by:Renato Montenegro Rustici
ID: 16418635
One more information. Cache should improve the performance. "Write Back" is the best configuration, but if you dont have a UPS device, it can be too risky.
LVL 35

Author Comment

ID: 16419940
Controller is
8 channel SATA II RAID controler - PCI-X 133 Mhz

Onboad is Intel E7230 Chipset with LSI Embeded with Intel 3,0 GHz P4 (Prescott)

What I'm wondering about are two things:
Both controllers are affected, less than 3 MByte/s is not really what I expect (1 single HD on internal or external controller).  
Both controllers results in expected rates, if cache is enabled.

Everything I have read about different caching technologies is talking about a vaiance between 30 - 50%. The hardrive delivers data about 60 MBytes/s, that means, the throughput should be round about 30 MByte/s in worst case.

The benchmark I have used is PassMark Performance Test, which uses a 1Gig file, so the 128 MB Cache of the controller should not make such a big difference in performance.  

I used HDTach on my system (E7230 Chipset, 3,2GHz Prescott, LSI Embeded Onboad Raid 1 with 2xMaxtor DMax10 and a Adaptec U320 SCSI Controller with 3 Maxtor Atlas 10K), all cache disabled

On the LSI Controller, I get av. 59,2 MByte/s (165 Burst) (Raid 1)
On the SCSI Controller, I get 72,3 MByte/s (207 Burst) (Raid 5)

Which looks o.k.

As the problem machine is similar than my machine, it should show similar results?

LVL 11

Expert Comment

by:Renato Montenegro Rustici
ID: 16421582
Yes, it should.
LVL 44

Expert Comment

ID: 16423646
The cahcing is a motherboard/CPU caching ,and it makes a 10x to 50x improvement in performance, the specs you got are software caching, hardware caching on the CPU and MB make a HUGE difference in performance.  ANy 3000 CPU today, if you disable the cache on the MB, it will run like a 350MHz CPU.  Caching at hardware level is most important for file reads, copies and transfers across the data bus.  If you dont have this enabled, simple file copying, like in windows install, takes 20x to 50x longer than cache.

Conclusion, hardware caching at the board level is what gives you the performance you expect in file copies across the DATA bus of the motherboard, without it, the speed is AT LEAST 10X slower, more likely 20X slower.
LVL 11

Expert Comment

by:Renato Montenegro Rustici
ID: 16425346
Sorry scrathcyboy. The cache in question is the disk cache. Not the CPU cache. But, even with disk cache disabled, the throughput should be in the range shown in his last post.

Featured Post

Concerto's Cloud Advisory Services

Want to avoid the missteps to gaining all the benefits of the cloud? Learn more about the different assessment options from our Cloud Advisory team.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

The article will include the best Data Recovery Tools along with their Features, Capabilities, and their Download Links. Hope you’ll enjoy it and will choose the one as required by you.
Article by: evilrix
Looking for a way to avoid searching through large data sets for data that doesn't exist? A Bloom Filter might be what you need. This data structure is a probabilistic filter that allows you to avoid unnecessary searches when you know the data defin…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of installing the necessary services and then configuring a Windows Server 2012 system as an iSCSI target. To install the necessary roles, go to Server Manager, and select Add Roles and Featu…
This Micro Tutorial will teach you how to reformat your flash drive. Sometimes your flash drive may have issues carrying files so this will completely restore it to manufacturing settings. Make sure to backup all files before reformatting. This w…
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month10 days, 14 hours left to enroll

572 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question