Recordcount of filtered recordset slow

I am using the rst.Filter method and then trying to do a count of the filtered recordset. The problem is that the recordcount pauses for about 10-15 seconds. But for other larger recordset that are not filtered, recordcount works pretty fast. Does anyone know why this is or how I can get around it.
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Bob LambersonSoftware EngineerCommented:
The filter method is slow, especially if you have a lot of records or criteria.

It would be better to set another recordset variable and create an sql string to execute to fill it. You can use your filter condition as a where clause in the sql. This should be much faster.


Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
leeskelton83Author Commented:
I was trying to avoid opening another recordset but oh well.
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Visual Basic Classic

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.