IF JS needs to go, why not the CSS too?

Many search engine optimization specialists say to kill all the Javascript code at the top of the page, and put it at the bottom - it helps search engines index the pages (I am not thoroughly convinced of this, but .. )

So on most of my pages, the CSS is actually LONGER than the JS routines.  If we are trying to "pamper" the search engines so they wont get bent out of shape, how about all that voluminous CSS?  Should it be moved to the end of the document, or does it all have to be included in an include file, which is a pain to edit in a separate file?  If it goes at the end, how can this be done, it is supposed to be at the beginning?

How much do you have to pamper search engines, with CSS and JS?
LVL 44
scrathcyboyAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

sitecreationsCommented:
Why do you feel it's difficult to manage sep. CSS JS files?   I find it far more convenient to hold them outside in their own areas than to try to worry about where the CSS is in a project.  It also reduces site publishing time, and improves site performance depending on how the server caching is set up.

My rule is 70k, but others say 100k.   If your page is >100k, you've got problems with some SE spiders skipping parts of your content.  I always put Javascript in .js files unless I have one very specific function for that file (such as a form validatation that is unique to a certain form, etc.)   CSS is usually more generic and applicable to more than one page.

I think it will pay great dividends for you to begin putting your CSS definitions in different files and coming up with a naming convention to make referring to said CSS easy.  This way you not only reduce the work involved in managing CSS, but you are probably going to make it a little easier on the spiders.

In SEO, of course, there aren't too many improvements that are "home runs"... everything is incremental.  So count this as one of them.  A little improvement that you can add to the others.

Best of luck,

Sc
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
scrathcyboyAuthor Commented:
Problem I have is in uploading, sure I can edit CSS and JS file separate, but then I have to manually add each one to the upload sequence, it is royal pain in the neck.  But as you say, if it is worth it, then it is worth it, period.  For first time ever, my index.html on latest site is 101K, biggest size I have ever done.

But I find the amalgamation of CSS styles is impossible without having one monster CSS.  Each site I do its 100% different from last, all custom tailored to the "feel" and theme of the site.  One CSS is impossible.

BTW< yours is very good contribution, hits at heart of issue.  Tell me how important it is to get rid of CSS data at front, for search engine ease of indexing?
0
sitecreationsCommented:
The tools I use notice the dependency on the external CSS, and if it's changed, upload it without any added work from me, so it's not an issue.  It's not an all or nothing thing ... I usually have 3-4 CSS files for large sites.  The CSS link-in (and .JS) sequence will be from generic to specific at the top.  It's a style thing, though.  We all have our own method.  Mine comes from the old days of C/C++ include directives when I used to write lots of code.

btw, here are the estimated will-index sizes for major engines

MSN 150k
Google 101K
Yahoo 240K appx
Ask 101K appx



0
scrathcyboyAuthor Commented:
Well I bit bullet and did what you said, now index page is 97K, will be 100K with meta tags.  I think you have answered the question, and as promised in my previous one, I will up points and thank you for your help in forcing me to get these two big baggages into separate files.  On big sites, I will do it in the future.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Internet Marketing

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.