Refresh

Nice copy and paste. :-/

-r-

@techguy90....Roonaan's answer was first and correct... My comment was posted the same time..so that should have been correct too. In addition, you accepted felixmosesj which is correct, but totally plagarized from another website (which violates EE rules).  A simple URL to the other site would have sufficed.

The correct course of this solution was to accept the first comment.

irwinpks,

techguy10 - techguy90 + felixmosesj are scamming EE. I have asked Netminder to look into this.

Review felixmosesj answer history and you will notice the same thing I noticed.

-r-

@roonaan...good point... uncool.. I feel and IP & Email ban coming soon.

@roonaan.. i posted a question in support to look into this.

I notice your question an have subscribed to it. Thank you for your prompt action.

-r-

i wonder what they get out of this, other than building points.  unless they are building up to get enough points for a hard question they want answered.. probably the same person with multiple email accounts.

They get premium access I guess. Which allows them to search the database and browse without ads.

that's messed up...surely they are reading this.

split between roonaan & myself... we both posted the same time.. .though his was first, i supplemented by informing the correct positioning of the <meta> tag.

@netminder...please refer to my previous comment. thanks in advance.

I agree with irwinpks. A split would be fine.

-r-