philips 200w6 response time

Hi,

I am just wondering whether someone knows the response time of the 20'' Philips 200w6 monitor. According to the magazine ‘pc pro’ it is 16ms whereas a seller on the Internet says 8ms.

Thanks,

Chris
csetzkornAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

tmj883Commented:
Everything I see says 16ms and in agreement with Philips. The seller appears misinformed.
T
0
Gary CaseRetiredCommented:
Philips says 8ms, so I'd say it's 8ms.

This may be a case of two different sources saying the same thing in two different ways.   Think of a sine wave -- if you measure the peak-to-peak time you'll get one measurement; if you measure peak-to-valley you'll get half of that.   The spec you quoted above says it can turn on or off in 8ms;  so it will take 2 x 8ms = 16ms to turn on AND off.    I don't know if that's why the magazine said 16ms or not, but it would explain the difference.

0
Ultimate Tool Kit for Technology Solution Provider

Broken down into practical pointers and step-by-step instructions, the IT Service Excellence Tool Kit delivers expert advice for technology solution providers. Get your free copy now.

csetzkornAuthor Commented:
peak-to-peak => 2Pi => on,off,on => 24ms

peak-to-valley => Pi => on,off => 8ms

just a thought though ...

The problem is that pc pro states 8ms for the acer al2032wa. shall i half this time then as well ?  ....



0
Gary CaseRetiredCommented:
Note your math:  2Pi = 2 x Pi ==> the number is double, not triple

But no, I doubt you'd half the time for the acer.   I suspect the difference is not really anything so subtle; it's just a case of misquoting the specifications.   I'd go with the Philips specs, as most magazine reviews simply quote the literature anyway;  they rarely (if ever these days) actually have the test equipment to measure the actual response.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
csetzkornAuthor Commented:
>Note your math:  2Pi = 2 x Pi ==> the number is double, not triple

sure - sorry first day after the easter break. should be 16ms of course

ok thanks. i guess i trust philips ... (-;




0
tmj883Commented:
Picture/Display
• LCD panel type: 1680 x 1050 pixels, Anti-glare
polarizer, RGB vertical stripe
• Panel Size: 20.1"/ 51 cm
• Effective viewing area: 433.4 x 270.9 mm
• Pixel pitch: 0.258 x 0.258 mm
• Brightness (nits): 300 nit
• Contrast ratio (typical): 600:1
• Display colors: 16.7 M
• Viewing angle: - C/R > 10
• Viewing angle (H / V): 176 / 176 degree
• Response time (typical): 16 ms
• White Chromaticity, 6500K: x = 0.313 /
y = 0.329
• White Chromaticity, 9300K: x = 0.283 /
y = 0.297
• Maximum Resolution: 1680 x 1050 @ 75Hz
You are not looking at the correct spec...
It is 16ms.
T
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Hardware

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.