2611XM/3548XL - Subinterfaces and VLANs

I am experiencing issues assigning IP address when attempting to trunk multiple VLANs up to a single CISCO 2611 using subinterfaces.....

I have a CISCO 2611 XM and a CISCO 3548 XL...I am trying to use FA 0/0 with subinterfaces (2611) and vlan access [desired ports] (3548) to carry multiple VLANs.

192.168.100.0/24 [VLAN 100 on the 3548]
192.168.200.0/24 [VLAN 200 on the 3548]

-==2611==-
int fa 0/0.1
encap dot1q 100
ip address 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0

int fa 0/0.2
encap dot1q 200
ip address 192.168.200.0 255.255.255.0

-==3548==-
int fa 0/1
switchport mode trunk (allowed all)

int fa 0/3
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 100

I do not have any speed/duplex issues or any up/down issues.....I have dhcp pools setup for both and dhcp-server/networks setup per VLAN (problem ???)....I currently have no L3 management IP established on the 3548 so int VLAN1 remains up up....Obviously as soon as I revert back to a single network on fa 0/0 with no sub-ifs it works fine.

I have seen several proposed solution regarding "secondary" interfaces resolving several peoples issues with physical interface limitations but unfortunately that hasn't worked for me.
ciscowannabeAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

pjtemplinCommented:
What is the problem?  Amongst other things, you might need "swit tru enc dot1q" (and if so, "swit tru enc dot1q non" would probably be better) on 3548 int f0/1 to force the trunking protocol.  Routers don't participate in DTP, so a switch expecting DTP might not trunk or might attempt ISL instead of dot1q.

You may also want to shutdown the 3548 int VLAN1 and create/setup an int VLAN 100 ...OR... 200, so that you can telnet to the 3548.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
calvinetterCommented:
  Look at your configured IPs on the subinterfaces:
int fa 0/0.1
ip address 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0  <- network address; should be something like 192.168.100.1 ...

int fa 0/0.2
ip address 192.168.200.0 255.255.255.0  <- network address; should be something like 192.168.200.1 ...

  Then you can deal with routing between VLANs:
Workstations on VLAN 100 would have their default gateway set to: 192.168.100.1
Workstations on VLAN 200 would have their default gateway set to: 192.168.200.1

On the switch, you could do this in order to remotely manage it:
  int vlan 100
  ip address 192.168.100.2 255.255.255.0
  no shut

  ip default-gateway 192.168.100.1

cheers
0
ciscowannabeAuthor Commented:
calvinetter - The IP addresses on the sub-ifs are .1 - sorry for the misinformation.

I'm checking into the above solution recommendations. Thanks,
0
ciscowannabeAuthor Commented:
Forgetting about lack of DTP was it....I forced trunk encap and that did it....thanks pjtemplin.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Networking

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.