Opteron 165 Vs. Athlon 2x 3800+

Posted on 2006-04-20
Last Modified: 2010-04-26
Any benchmark charts/opinions on which is better? Opteron 165 or Athlon 2x 3800+? Not really an overclocker. I guess I'll think about it a little down the road, when this isn't giving me what I need. But for the time being whitch will give me what I need? Right now I'm mostly a general user, but I would like to play newer games (Oblivion, FEAR, ect.) with ease and stability. Also right now I can actually get the Opteron for ~$25 lower the the 3800.
Question by:TrevorCook
    LVL 70

    Accepted Solution

    I'd definitely go with the Opteron.   It's a more "industrial strength" design, has double the cache, and is clocked very similarly (1.8GHz vs 2.0GHz).   The higher percentage of cache hits will help your performance much more than the minor clocking difference.
    LVL 7

    Assisted Solution

    Dual-Core Opteron 939

    AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (2.0GHz, dual core, 512KB L2 per core)
    AMD Opteron 165 (1.8GHz, dual core, 1MB L2 per core)
    has double l2 cache and this makes it as fast as AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ may be even better when oc.

    compare then here:

    it is made initially for servers and sounds better when you say OPTERON or OPTY.
    all dual Optys have 2M l2 cache, not all ath64 have so much.
    as far as i know is 100% compatible with ath64.
    you can buy one tested in freq so you could be sure how much you can overclock it.
    if you need stability when overclocking try to get DFI motherboards.

    a benchmark:
    LVL 70

    Expert Comment

    ... the benchmark results Visual3DMaya posted in his last link clearly show what I said above => the extra cache helps enough that the Opteron beat the Athlon in almost every test.

    ... there's a reason Cray uses Opteron's in their latest supercomputer :-)  :-)
    LVL 69

    Expert Comment

    Didn't you ask this same question here?

    There's a benchmark included in that thread, which shows that the 3800+ has an edge over the 165.  The 165 is capable of much higher overclocking, though.
    LVL 70

    Expert Comment

    Your previous question is pretty similar -- although it focused more on the different Opteron cores.   I don't agree with the answer to the other question (there is a substantial gain with doubling the L2 cache), but you seem to be focused on the Denmark core anyhow, so the result's the same.

    I'm not an overclocker, but the Opteron's are, as I noted above, a "more industrial" design than the Athlons; and consequently they're much more "overclockable" -- should you ever decide to do that.   As Callandor noted in your last question, "... the low-end Opterons are phenomenal performers for the price.  A friend has an Opteron 148 that goes up to 2.75GHz, so it seems an achievable goal."

    You're not looking at what I'd call a "low-end" Opteron here, but I think the focus of Callandor's statement still holds true:  they're excellent values.
    LVL 7

    Expert Comment

    I must come back and be more precise.
    Opty 165 falls about 5-10% behind the Athlon 64 X2 3800+, the youngest processor in the corresponding family, in most applications (except the games), as says here among athers
    I would prefer Opty 165, maybe i'll look for an Opty 170 too.
    Games became annoying going slowly while some applications demand it otherwise you can't see what's going on.

    Featured Post

    Scale it in WD Gold

    With up to ten times the workload capacity of desktop drives, WD Gold hard drives employ advanced technology to deliver among the best in reliability, capacity, power efficiency and performance.

    Join & Write a Comment

    We recently endured a series of broadcast storms that caused our ISP to shut us down for brief periods of time. After going through a multitude of tests, we determined that the issue was related to Intel NIC drivers on some new HP desktop computers …
    This paper addresses the security of Sennheiser DECT Contact Center and Office (CC&O) headsets. It describes the DECT security chain comprised of “Pairing”, “Per Call Authentication” and “Encryption”, which are all part of the standard DECT protocol.
    Excel styles will make formatting consistent and let you apply and change formatting faster. In this tutorial, you'll learn how to use Excel's built-in styles, how to modify styles, and how to create your own. You'll also learn how to use your custo…
    Here's a very brief overview of the methods PRTG Network Monitor ( offers for monitoring bandwidth, to help you decide which methods you´d like to investigate in more detail.  The methods are covered in more detail in o…

    729 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

    Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

    Join & Ask a Question

    Need Help in Real-Time?

    Connect with top rated Experts

    20 Experts available now in Live!

    Get 1:1 Help Now