cannot make more than one client connection over a NAT device

network A : 192.168.1.x/24
because network A node come over full, so i build a NAT to free more IP to use
network B : 192.168.2.x/24
i try to build a NAT by linksys router and netscreen firewall, everything work fine, but fail to copy file from network B to network A (which is win 2003 server share folder), it can copy file sometime and drop it out, even smail file size.

I found the knowledge base on microsft, it's the exactly case.;en-us;301673

however, it seem no solution on it, what i should solve it, build a linux samba to share or build a ftp service to share a folder on win2003, but seem so strange that to let internal user copy file between same office location.

pls advise or any other solution to free up the ip usage (my office grow up to 250 pc), thanks.
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Why not just change the mask to a /23 ( This would give you an IP range of to or 510 IP's all on the same network. This is known as supernetting or combining multiple class C addresses into one network.

If you don't want to use the zero subnet you could use through with a /23 mask and get the same number of IP's.


edmondto2Author Commented:
because i concern that there will be too much collusion on the network and slow down the whole network,
actually, would it happen?
and the win 2003 server dhcp can config the allocate ip range from to

Is it a switched network? If so than collisions wouldn't be a problem.  It would be a larger broadcast domain and depending on how much broadcast traffic there is it might pose a problem, but if it's not a problem now, then adding 10-20 more machines probably wouldn't be noticable.

You can change the DHCP scope to use the /23 mask but the addresses would need to be 192.168.0.x - 192.168.1.x or 192.168.2.x - 192.168.3.x.  The only way you could get both the .1 and .2 ranges on the same network would be to use a /22 mask which would give you .0 thru .3 and ~ 1020 hosts.



Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Windows Networking

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.